During scrutiny, GST Officials ask to produce Undertaking from Service Providers [ in absence of 2017 bills etc] that they paid tax and invoice was wrongly reported under B2C category / incorrectly reported in GSTR 1 of respective month instead of B2B category. Does this make sense? If undertaking goes wrong, who will be held responsible? Is there any other alternative? Kindly advise.
4 Replies
CA Sorav Gupta
(Chartered Accountant)
(1005 Points)
Replied 09 March 2023
Yes, the GST officer is correct. The CBIC has notified this procedure which needs to be carried out in case the input of up to Rs. 2.5 lacs related to F.Y. 17-18 is not showing in GSTR- 2A of the taxpayer .
In case of any further queries, kindly mail me at casoravgupta @ gmail.com
Thanks & Regards
CA. Sorav Gupta
(Practicing Chartered Accountant)
Jamil Ahmed
(62 Points)
Replied 10 March 2023
It's 5 lacs, not 2.5 lacs. For less than 5 lacs, declaration from the supplier is required whereas for 5 lacs and above, a certificate from a CA is to be produced.
Jayanta Bandyopadhyay
(310 Points)
Replied 10 March 2023
Many thanks.
Would you please share circular regarding requirement of CA or statutory auditor certificate.
Service provider is still clueless. They feel based on Proforma Invoice, service receiver paid the amount and new series Invoice ref for same amount was uploaded on portal. Thus there is a mismatch. How to fix it as all employees are new and hearing is fixed on 13 Mar.
Recent Topics
- 80D claim for payment paid by parent
- TDS on purchase of Flat under subvention scheme be
- Nznxnc call me at the end of the day of the
- Nsje snswk fjw ed le ene djff ne enje ejdd rejje
- Hxjcif the day I have been in touch with me and
- Iska djd djrbdsjebshe sir ur rei ejr reinr the jr
- GST registration for medical shop in Karnataka
- Hsshs me know if you are free number of the
- Chu Kang and the situation of the situation and I
- How to reverse wrong transaction payment in phonep
Related Threads
CAclubindia
