All I can say is "Congrats to your sis and friends". Rightly said that we can't debate on the basis of perception. Anyways my point is value addition and not average salary and I already proved it that even a B.com graduate can earn 3 lacs with the knowledge of SAP. Further you also agree to the fact that there are many CA (MANY even if not on an average basis) who are working at salary of 20-25K, so if a CA is working for a salary as low as 20-25K while a B.com is also earning 25K than it is really a big deal. So tell me "do you agree that it is better to introduce SAP as subject rather than ISCA???" I have mentioned some additional points in last part of my comment please consider them before answering the above question.
And as per my knowledge of SAP, a CA/CS/CWA cannot be a SAP-Consultant unless he knows VB, .net etc types of programming language (this is why I said that my knowledge is different about SAP). And I am telling you this with my personal work experience. But there is a little difference, that my experience is with ERP software called LOGIC ERP. The guy who was implementing that system told me that LOGIC and SAP has no difference except that SAP enjoys a international brand name while LOGIC is a Indian ERP system. SAP is used by business entities because of its custom reports (there are other advantages also, but mainly it is used due to its report making ability; reports are used for analysis and control). To make custom reports there are commands to be written in programming language, CA has no role in it. The role of CA is that he will only give the format of report (like date, no. of units sold, rate, amt etc) and programmer will program it for him. SAP when implemented for the first time is like a open source program/stand-alone software with pre-loaded formats of reports, user modify it with the help of IT manager/implementing team (SAP CONSULTANT) and they are not CA/CS/CWA, they are from IT background like MCA, B.E etc. A complete package of SAP with all the modules (including FICO) along with other necessary software/hardware would cost around 30Crore(not that costly for ICAI) and annual AMC of 5-6 lac to be paid to SAP-INDIA. Private institutes charge around 4-6lacs to train a single module like AP/GL/Payroll etc. Further SAP is not software like MS OFFICE that one can install it from a CD. SAP can be installed/implemented by the team who is authorized by SAP-INDIA or employee team of SAP-INDIA. Hence SAP CONSULTANT must be an employee of SAP-INDIA or among the affiliated team of SAP-INDIA. This is my knowledge of SAP and thus this SAP-CONSULTANT certification to a CA (or to anyone who isn't an employee of SAP) seems valueless, as CA can't implement SAP. Although CA of the co. in which ERP is to be/being implemented is part of the implementation team but he is mainly related to accounting data conversion, designing framework of internal check to be given to programmer for converting that framework into actual operation in that ERP/SAP for eg. for sale below 1lakh there will not be any discount. This thing doesn't require any certification since a CA learn these things in auditing and assurance. And by SAP as a subject I mean practical end-user training (from the very beginning i mean end-user only).
And
Some part of SAP-CONSULTANT training should also be part of the subject but theoretical only. Like how SAP is developed or customised, how it is tested etc. By this way it will cover whole of the SDLC part of ISCA and 80% topics of ISCA is SDLC and its related topic like testing, implementation etc. Don’t know how much I am correct but to me-: ISCA as a subject tells us about SAP/ERP, how they are developed, how they are tested, how to audit each phase, how files are maintained in it etc. My suggestion is tell us about SAP and with the help of SAP explain us SDLC and its topic. By this way it will be more interesting and is much easier to understand and will bring an in-sight about software developing process. The present system of ISCA as a subject is boring, and seems less-important to me further there is feeling “why we are studying ISCA?”