Originally posted by : CA Parul Saxena |
|
I am against the ICAI because after completing CA i am still not in good job.Every employer say you dont have experience in transfer pricing , SAP etc etc.....but amendments is part of this profession we are capable of applying any amendment to have practical exposure in each and every thing is not possible.
I have seen many people who invest their several important years in this course and after so many attempts what they gain again demoralization from companies they dont hire them again they have to join a CA firm at very low pacakge....inspite of that if we have invested our years in preparation of competitive exam of banks or other organisation we would have settled till date and have satisfaction.
In My time there was one gmcs and they just told how to behave interview etc and again discrimination is everywhere they usually just gave example of GDs by making participating the students who were already trained in Big 4 etc. |
|
Okay. That's a genuine reason. I will agree with your points.
But do you get anything by cursing your fate? Or Cursing ICAI?
Okay, now- Let us look at the other side.
Engineers who get good packages- I am here referring to the Engineering passing out of non-elite colleges. They don't learn everything in the Engineering colleges. The syllabus in their curriculum is redundant and one can't enter into an MNC with that knowledge. They will have to sit and learn a lot of stuff which makes them capable of handling a job. A lot of Engineers today are entering fields like Commerce, Trade, Marketing which have got nothing to with Engineering. Do you think they enter these fields without knowing anything about them? They learn a lot of stuff through the internet or books and then make a realistic plan. I know a couple of Engineers who are doing this. It was very tough for them to get their first job in marketing as their CGPA was low. But still they made it happen.
Learning:-Search for the Opportunities around you and try grabbing each of them.
MBA Graduates :- Ask any CA about MBAs from institutes other than the IIMs, they will only give you one reply-"They are good at communicating and negotiating, but when it comes to knowledge, we take the lead". Though this may hold true for a lot of roadside institues, one should not forget that there are decent Tier 2 colleges where you see a lot of students who are dedicated and industrious. A lot of them today are going for the courses like CFA, FRM etc. and the content of such courses is definitely comparable to CA when it comes to the positions related finance.The big issue here:-
-A CA is exhausted after giving CA Final Exams and has a hell lot of expections after that. The work done at the articleship firm is also responsible for such.
-An MBA graduate is not exhausted and tries to know/fulfill the expectations of the company.(This only holds true for the ones who are meritorious ones from decent Tier 2 colleges. The case is completely different with the IIM graduates).
Learning:-You can take up a professional course like CFA or FRM.
------------------------------
And you've said something like ...."inspite of that if we have invested our years in preparation of competitive exam of banks or other organisation we would have settled till date and have satisfaction."
There is no quick growth in such Banks. You will have to sit at the same place and do the same job for years. The career growth in sectors like Finance is faster when you compare that to a person's career graph in a nationalized bank.
Any more queries?