Dear Dharmaraju,
Regarding ur first doubt -
Related party - parties are considered to be related if at any time during the reporting period one party has the ability to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and/or operating decisions.
Disclosures -
Para 21 Name of the related party and nature of the related party relationship where control exists should be disclosed irrespective of whether or not there have been transactions between the related parties.
Para 23 If there have been transactions between related parties, during the existence of a related party relationship, the reporting enterprise should disclose the following:.............."
The combined reading of above things brings the answer to ur question as "Yes"
Regarding ur second doubt -
Para 4 of AS-18 says -
In the context of this Statement, the following are deemed not to be related parties:
(a) two companies simply because they have a director in common, notwithstanding paragraph 3(d) or (e) above (unless the director is able to affect the policies of both companies in their mutual dealings);
(c) the parties listed below, in the course of their normal dealings with an enterprise by virtue only of those dealings (although they may circumscribe the freedom of action of the enterprise or participate in its decision-making process):
(i) providers of finance;
Answer is No.....