thanks madhumita.. its our pleasure but we  really appreciate if u particpate on regular basis..

Objective

IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards sets out the procedures that an entity must follow when it adopts IFRSs for the first time as the basis for preparing its general purpose financial statements.

Definition of first-time adoption

A first-time adopter is an entity that, for the first time, makes an explicit and unreserved statement that its general purpose financial statements comply with IFRSs.

An entity may be a first-time adopter if, in the preceding year, it prepared IFRS financial statements for internal management use, as long as those IFRS financial statements were not and given to owners or external parties such as investors or creditors. If a set of IFRS financial statements was, for any reason, given to an external party in the preceding year, then the entity will already be considered to be on IFRSs, and IFRS 1 does not apply.

An entity can also be a first-time adopter if, in the preceding year, its published financial statements asserted:

• Compliance with some but not all IFRSs.
• Included only a reconciliation of selected figures from previous GAAP to IFRSs. (Previous GAAP means the GAAP that an entity followed immediately before adopting to IFRSs.)

However, an entity is not a first-time adopter if, in the preceding year, its published financial statements asserted:

• Compliance with IFRSs even if the auditor's report contained a qualification with respect to conformity with IFRSs.
• Compliance with both previous GAAP and IFRSs.

Effective date of IFRS 1

IFRS 1 applies if an entity's first IFRS financial statements are for a period beginning on or after 1 January 2004. Earlier application is encouraged.

Overview for an entity that adopts IFRSs for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2009

Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs at the time of first-time adoption

1. Derecognition of some old assets and liabilities. The entity should eliminate previous-GAAP assets and liabilities from the opening balance sheet if they do not qualify for recognition under IFRSs. For example:

• a. IAS 38 does not permit recognition of expenditure on any of the following as an intangible asset:
  • research
  • start-up, pre-operating, and pre-opening costs
  • training
  • advertising and promotion
  • moving and relocation
  If the entity's previous GAAP had recognised these as assets, they are eliminated in the opening IFRS balance sheet.

   

• b. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed accrual of liabilities for "general reserves", restructurings, future operating losses, or major overhauls that do not meet the conditions for recognition as a provision under IAS 37, these are eliminated in the opening IFRS balance sheet.

   

• c. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed recognition of reimbursements and contingent assets that are not virtually certain, these are eliminated in the opening IFRS balance sheet.

2. Recognition of some new assets and liabilities. Conversely, the entity should recognise all assets and liabilities that are required to be recognised by IFRS even if they were never recognised under previous GAAP. For example:

• a. IAS 39 requires recognition of all derivative financial assets and liabilities, including embedded derivatives. These were not recognised under many local GAAPs.

   

• b. IAS 19 requires an employer to recognise its liabilities under defined benefit plans. These are not just pension liabilities but also obligations for medical and life insurance, vacations, termination benefits, and deferred compensation. In the case of "over-funded" plans, this would be a defined benefit asset.

   

• c. IAS 37 requires recognition of provisions as liabilities. Examples could include an entity's obligations for restructurings, onerous contracts, decommissioning, remediation, site restoration, warranties, guarantees, and litigation.

   

• d. Deferred tax assets and liabilities would be recognised in conformity with IAS 12.

   

3. Reclassification. The entity should reclassify previous-GAAP opening balance sheet items into the appropriate IFRS classification. Examples:

 

• a. IAS 10 does not permit classifying dividends declared or proposed after the balance sheet date as a liability at the balance sheet date. In the opening IFRS balance sheet these would be reclassified as a component of retained earnings.

   

• b. If the entity's previous GAAP had allowed treasury stock (an entity's own shares that it had purchased) to be reported as an asset, it would be reclassified as a component of equity under IFRS.

   

• c. Items classified as identifiable intangible assets in a business combination accounted for under the previous GAAP may be required to be classified as goodwill under IAS 22 because they do not meet the definition of an intangible asset under IAS 38. The converse may also be true in some cases. These items must be reclassified.

   

• d. IAS 32 has principles for classifying items as financial liabilities or equity. Thus mandatorily redeemable preferred shares and puttable shares that may have been classified as equity under previous GAAP would be reclassified as liabilities in the opening IFRS balance sheet.

  Note that IFRS 1 makes an exception from the "split-accounting" provisions of IAS 32. If the liability component of a compound financial instrument is no longer outstanding at the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet, the entity is not required to reclassify out of retained earnings and into other equity the original equity component of the compound instrument.

   

• e. The reclassification principle would apply for the purpose of defining reportable segments under IAS 14.

   

• f. The scope of consolidation might change depending on the consistency of the previous-GAAP requirements to those in IAS 27. In some cases, IFRS will require consolidated financial statements where they were not required before.

   

• g. Some offsetting (netting) of assets and liabilities or of income and expense items that had been acceptable under previous GAAP may no longer be acceptable under IFRS.

4. Measurement. The general measurement principle – there are several significant exceptions noted below – is to apply IFRS in measuring all recognised assets and liabilities. Therefore, if an entity adopts IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2009, in general it would use the measurement principles in IFRSs in force at 31 December 2009.

5. Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRS at the time of first-time adoption. These should be recognised directly in retained earnings or other appropriate category of equity at the date of transition to IFRSs.

How to recognise adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs

Adjustments required to move from previous GAAP to IFRSs at the time of first-time adoption should be recognised directly in retained earnings or, if appropriate, another category of equity at the date of transition to IFRSs.

Exceptions to the basic measurement principle in IFRS 1

1. Optional exceptions. There are some important exceptions to the general restatement and measurement principles set out above. The following exceptions are individually optional, not mandatory:

Business combinations that occurred before opening balance sheet date

a. An entity may keep the original previous-GAAP accounting, that is, not restate:

• previous mergers or goodwill written-off from reserves;
• the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities recognised at the date of acquisition or merger;
• how goodwill was initially determined (do not adjust the purchase price allocation on acquisition).

b. However, should it wish to do so, an entity can elect to restate all business combinations starting from a date it selects prior to the opening balance sheet date.

c. In all cases, the entity must make an initial IAS 36 impairment test of any remaining goodwill in the opening IFRS balance sheet, after reclassifying, as appropriate, previous GAAP intangibles to goodwill.

d. IFRS 1 includes an appendix explaining how a first-time adopter should account for business combinations that occurred prior to transition to IFRS.

Property, plant, and equipment, intangible assets, and investment property carried under the cost model

a. These assets may be measured at their fair value at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (this option applies to intangible assets only if an active market exists). Fair value becomes the "deemed cost" going forward under the IFRS cost model. (Deemed cost is an amount used as a surrogate for cost or depreciated cost at a given date.)

b. If, before the date of its first IFRS balance sheet, the entity had revalued any of these assets under its previous GAAP either to fair value or to a price-index-adjusted cost, that previous-GAAP revalued amount at the date of the revaluation can become the deemed cost of the asset under IFRS.

c. If, before the date of its first IFRS balance sheet, the entity had made a one-time revaluation of assets or liabilities to fair value because of a privatisation or initial public offering, and the revalued amount became deemed cost under the previous GAAP, that amount (adjusted for any subsequent depreciation, amortisation, and impairment) would continue to be deemed cost after the initial adoption of IFRS.

IAS 19 - Employee benefits: actuarial gains and losses

An entity may elect to recognise all cumulative actuarial gains and losses for all defined benefit plans at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (that is, reset any corridor recognised under previous GAAP to zero), even if it elects to use the IAS 19 corridor approach for actuarial gains and losses that arise after first-time adoption of IFRS. If an entity does not elect to apply this exemption, it must restate all defined benefit plans under IAS 19 since the inception of those plans (which may differ from the effective date of IAS 19).

IAS 21 - Accumulated translation reserves

An entity may elect to recognise all translation adjustments arising on the translation of the financial statements of foreign entities in accumulated profits or losses at the opening IFRS balance sheet date (that is, reset the translation reserve included in equity under previous GAAP to zero). If the entity elects this exemption, the gain or loss on subsequent disposal of the foreign entity will be adjusted only by those accumulated translation adjustments arising after the opening IFRS balance sheet date. If the entity does not elect to apply this exemption, it must restate the translation reserve for all foreign entities since they were acquired or created.

 

2. Mandatory exceptions. There are also three important exceptions to the general restatement and measurement principles set out above that are mandatory, not optional. These are:

IAS 39 - Derecognition of financial instruments

A first-time adopter is not permitted to recognise financial assets or financial liabilities that had been derecognised under its previous GAAP in a financial year beginning before 1 January 2001 (the effective date of IAS 39). This is consistent with the transition provision in IAS 39.172(a). However, if an SPE was used to effect the derecognition of financial instruments and the SPE is controlled at the opening IFRS balance sheet date, the SPE must be consolidated.

IAS 39 - Hedge accounting

The conditions in IAS 39.122-152 for a hedging relationship that qualifies for hedge accounting are applied as of the opening IFRS balance sheet date. The hedge accounting practices, if any, that were used in periods prior to the opening IFRS balance sheet may not be retrospectively changed. This is consistent with the transition provision in IAS 39.172(b). Some adjustments may be needed to take account of the existing hedging relationships under previous GAAP at the opening balance sheet date.

Information to be used in preparing IFRS estimates retrospectively

In preparing IFRS estimates retrospectively, the entity must use the inputs and assumptions that had been used to determine previous GAAP estimates in periods before the date of transition to IFRS, provided that those inputs and assumptions are consistent with IFRS. The entity is not permitted to use information that became available only after the previous-GAAP estimates were made except to correct an error.

Changes to disclosures

For many entities, new areas of disclosure will be added that were not requirements under the previous GAAP (perhaps segment information, earnings per share, discontinuing operations, contingencies, and fair values of all financial instruments) and disclosures that had been required under previous GAAP will be broadened (perhaps related party disclosures).

Disclosure of selected financial data for periods before the first IFRS balance sheet

IAS 1 only requires one year of full comparative financial statements. If a first-time adopter wants to disclose selected financial information for periods before the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet, it is not required to conform that information to IFRS. Conforming that earlier selected financial information to IFRSs is optional.

If the entity elects to present the earlier selected financial information based on its previous GAAP rather than IFRS, it must prominently label that earlier information as not complying with IFRS and, further, it must disclose the nature of the main adjustments that would make that information comply with IFRS. This latter disclosure is narrative and not necessarily quantified.

Of course, if the entity elects to present more than one year of full comparative prior period financial statements at the time of its transition to IFRSs, that will change the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet.

Disclosures in the financial statements of a first-time adopter

IFRS 1 requires disclosures that explain how the transition from previous GAAP to IFRS affected the entity's reported financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This includes:

1. Reconciliations of equity reported under previous GAAP to equity under IFRS both (a) at the date of the opening IFRS balance sheet and (b) the end of the last annual period reported under the previous GAAP. For an entity adopting IFRSs for the first time in its 31 December 2009 financial statements, the reconciliations would be as of 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2008.

2. Reconciliations of profit or loss for the last annual period reported under the previous GAAP to profit or loss under IFRSs for the same period.

3. Explanation of material adjustments that were made, in adopting IFRSs for the first time, to the balance sheet, income statement, and cash flow statement.

4. If errors in previous-GAAP financial statements were discovered in the course of transition to IFRSs, those must be separately disclosed.

5. If the entity recognised or reversed any impairment losses in preparing its opening IFRS balance sheet, these must be disclosed.

6. Appropriate explanations if the entity has availed itself of any of the specific recognition and measurement exemptions permitted under IFRS 1 – for instance, if it used fair values as deemed cost.

Disclosure of an impending change to IFRS

If an entity is going to adopt IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2009, certain disclosure are required in its interim financial statements prior to the 31 December 2009 statements, but only if those interim financial statements purport to comply with IAS 34 Interim Financial Reporting. Explanatory information and a reconciliation are required in the interim report that immediately precedes the first set of IFRS annual financial statements. The information includes changes in accounting policies compared to those under previous GAAP.

Compliance in interim reports in the year of first-time adoption of IFRS

If an entity that adopts IFRS for the first time in its annual financial statements for the year ended 31 December 2009, it is required to apply IFRS 1 in its interim financial reports for periods within the year ended 31 December 2009 if those interim reports are described as conforming to International Financial Reporting Standards. It would not be required to apply IFRS 1 if those interim reports are described as conforming to previous GAAP.

Different IFRS adoption dates of investor and investee

A parent or investor may become a first-time adopter earlier than or later than its subsidiary, associate, or joint venture investee. In these cases, IFRS 1 is applied as follows:

1. If the subsidiary has adopted IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements before the group to which it belongs adopts IFRS for the consolidated financial statements, then the subsidiary's first-time adoption date is still the date at which it adopted IFRS for the first-time, not that of the group. However, the group must use the IFRS measurements of the subsidiary's assets and liabilities for its first IFRS financial statements except for adjustments relating to the business combinations exemption and to conform group accounting policies.

2. If the group adopts IFRSs before the subsidiary adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the subsidiary has an option either (a) to elect that the group date of IFRS adoption is its transition date or (b) to first-time adopt in its entity-only financial statements.

3. If the group adopts IFRSs before the parent adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the parent's first-time adoption date is the date at which the group adopted IFRSs for the first time.

4. If the group adopts IFRSs before its associate or joint venture adopts IFRSs in its entity-only financial statements, then the associate or joint venture should have the option to elect that either the group date of IFRS adoption is its transition date or to first-time adopt in its entity-only financial statements.

we get all the information relating ti IFRS including the latest updates on www.iasplus.com .

Hi

amit great yaar keep it up

given link from anyone can download IFRS and IAS

https://www.worldgaapinfo.com/ifrs_ias.php

Dear Amit,

Thanks.

kindly let uw how to start for IFRS.

Hi,

I want one clarification. To the best of my understanding, convergence of IFRS in India, will mean all listed companies need to follow IFRS and non listed companies may continue following accounting standards already in place.

However, with so many ammendments in already existing standards to make the same in line with IFRS, automatically all companies will need to abide with modified standards.

Could the members share their thoughts on the same.

Got thru a very gud presentation on convergence from IGAAP to IFRS and some basic differences... Hope this will help the readers as it helped me..!

Regards

CA Madhumita Binani

fine job

hi all.. i came across an article on the fair value concept of IFRS:

hope this is informative for the members...!!!

REGARDS

MADHUMITA

It is a myth IFRS requires all assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value:

Ashish K Bhattacharyya / New Delhi April 20, 2009, 0:34 IST- Business Standard

The use of fair value measurement in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is much higher than compared to that in Indian GAAP. However, it is a myth IFRS requires all assets and liabilities to be measured at fair value. For example, IFRS provides an option to an entity to use either the cost model or the revaluation model to measure fixed assets (property, plant and equipment (PPE) and intangible assets) subsequent to initial recognition.

An entity that selects the revaluation model measures items of fixed asset at fair value. Therefore, it is not mandatory for an entity to carry fixed assets at fair value. An entity may use cost model for one class of fixed assets (e.g. plant and equipment) and revaluation model for another class of fixed assets (e.g. land). Under IFRS the principle for valuation of inventories is the same as that in Indian GAAP. Inventories are valued at lower of cost or net realizable value (NRV).

IFRS uses fair value model for initial measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities. Subsequently, equity instruments and derivatives are measured at fair value. Loan and advances and debt instruments which the entity intends to hold till maturity are measured at amortized cost and not at fair value. Fair value is also used to record assets (including fixed assets) and liabilities acquired in a business combination. Fair value of those assets is considered the acquisition cost.

Fair value is an important and difficult concept in accounting. Determination of fair value involves judgment. IFRS defines fair value as “The amount for which an asset could be exchanged, or liability settled, or an equity instrument granted, could be exchanged, between knowledgeable, willing parties on an arm’s length transaction”. SFAS 157 (US GAAP) defines fair value as “Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.” Although languages are different, in spirit both definitions are same. SFAS 157 provides detailed guidance on the measurement of fair value.

The transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability is a hypothetical transaction at the measurement date, considered from the perspective of a market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability. Thus fair value accounting is not the same as ‘mark-to-market’ accounting. In certain situations, for example, in the case of securities issued by a closely-held company, market value may not be available but fair value can be estimated. In certain circumstances, market value does not represent the fair value.

Fair value accounting should be viewed ‘mark-to-model’ accounting rather than ‘mark-to-market’ accounting. In estimating fair value entity uses ‘observable’ inputs, that is, assumptions based on market data from sources independent of the reporting entity. It also uses ‘unobservable’ inputs. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available in the circumstances.

SFAS 157 provides a hierarchy of inputs being used to determine the fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Examples of Level 2 inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Examples of active market are the capital market and the commodity exchange. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and should be used to measure fair value whenever available. A fair value measurement assumes the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, in the most advantageous market for the asset or liability.

Suppose a company (say A) holds equity shares issued by its vendor (say B), which supplies critical components. The balance sheet date of A is March 31. Assume that the last transaction in the equity shares of B on March 30. Assume that the closing price on March 30 was Rs 80.

Does the price of Rs 80 per share represent the fair value as on March 31? If the price is determined in an orderly transaction (that is, in a normal business activity) in an active market and no significant event has occurred after the market closed on March 30, the price of Rs 80 represent the fair value as March 31. If a significant event (e.g. cancellation of a long term contract by a large global customer of B) occurred after the close of the market, the price should be adjusted to determine the fair value.

Price quoted in an active market does not represent fair value if the volume and level of activity have decrease significantly and there is no orderly transaction for the asset or liability. Therefore, if the volume and level of transaction for the shares of B have decreased significantly and the transaction is not an orderly transaction the share price of Rs 80 does not represent fair value.

On April 9, 2009 FASB has issued a Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-4) which provides additional guidance on how to determine whether there has been a significant decrease in volume and level of transactions for a particular asset or liability. The Staff Position stipulates that if the reporting entity concludes that there has been significant decrease in the volume and level of activity, significant adjustments to the quoted price might be required to determine the fair value.

For example, when the volume and level of activities in mortgage-backed securities decreased significantly due to sub-prime crisis, the market price failed to reflect the fair value. The FASB Staff Position provides significant flexibility to reporting entities to significantly adjust the market price in those situations. Some may criticize it, but I think the rule is appropriate. But it puts significant responsibility on the auditor to ensure the adjustment is reasonable.

Market price may deviate from the fair value due to speculation even if the volume and activity level have not been decreased. The FASB Staff Position does not cover this case, perhaps rightly so because it is difficult to objectively identify such deviations without the benefit of hind sight.

good one