A funny case law (income tax act)

Page no : 5

P.R.KABRA (PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT)   (121 Points)
Replied 20 March 2014

@ Madhavi & @ Kaushik Nikhil : Can it be treated gift from God ? But how can we get depreciation as we never come to know it's cost ?  This is just for thought and LOL.

2 Like

himanshu satija (article assistant) (31 Points)
Replied 26 March 2014

Delhi ka hi shantibhushan ka case hai

Nikhil Kaushik (Fellow CA) (85743 Points)
Replied 26 March 2014

sir not necessarily depreciation, you can cover under section 37.. please note that the case has been unnecessarily publicized because of AAP connection.  Business entities are allowed to claim expense incurrred for health related issues for their directors, partners, employees etc.  The question at the base of this case is whether the same is allowed to individual professionals.  In this regard Delhi High Court preferred to differentiate from cases in favor of assessees and argue that individuals are not allowed for the same, which to a large extent I believe is a wrong position.  A practicing business/professional has everything dependent on his health.  To say that the same is not relevant for his profession, at the same time arguing that health of director is relevant for the company, is discrimination.    Thats all. 



(Guest)

"Business entities are allowed to claim expense incurrred for health related issues for their directors, partners, employees etc.  The question at the base of this case is whether the same is allowed to individual professionals."

One of the advantages of forming Firms, companies is that you can give allowances to ur partners/ directors/ employees for health related issues and claim deduction. But please note that when that amount (health allowance)is finally taxed in the individual hands of partners/ directors, no deduction is given to them for health related expenses and it is taxed. So, in effect, just the income is transferred from company to another assessee(director), there is no real tax saving. The director is taxed for the health allowance which he gets while the company gets deduction.

So, the position of law is quite clear and there is no discrimination.

(if health expenditure is allowed to Individuals, why not claim grocery, clothing,domestic help, laundary bills? A person has to eat to stay alive and work right?)

 


Kartik Shetty (Industrial Trainee) (109 Points)
Replied 03 April 2014

A very good explanation Madhavi..............

1 Like


CA Rajesh Pabari (Chartered Accountant) (1975 Points)
Replied 12 April 2014

I think, the expenditure should be allowed

CS Final student (CS Final) (78 Points)
Replied 15 June 2014

HAHAHHHHAAHA


sadashiv Rupchand Gaikwad (Proprietor) (521 Points)
Replied 14 April 2019

Mr Shanti Bhushan also having many cases against income tax.


sadashiv Rupchand Gaikwad (Proprietor) (521 Points)
Replied 14 April 2019

For small assessee it is time taken part and impractical for doing business


P.R.KABRA (PROFESSIONAL ACCOUNTANT)   (121 Points)
Replied 15 April 2019

After going through many experiences, now I am of the opinion that all individuals must be taxed on presumptive tax basis in future, based on assets held and reducing liabilities I.e. net capital. Only salary should be added on actuals. Discuss it.



Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Join CCI Pro


Subscribe to the latest topics :

Search Forum: