Revenue department cannot vivisect the business agreement to create demand
Last updated: 03 July 2024
Court :
Bombay High Court
Brief :
The Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Piramal Enterprises Ltd v. The State of Maharashtra [Writ Petition No. 2836 of 2021 dated June 11, 2024], held that clauses of business transfer agreement should be understood with the context it is entered into by parties, pick and choose approach adopted by the revenue to dissect the agreement, giving it a different meaning then by which it is entered into, is not sustainable, set aside the demand.
Citation :
Writ Petition No. 2836 of 2021 dated June 11, 2024]
You have reached daily limit of 2 Free Judgements. To view this or other Judgements please subscribe to CCI PRO :
Stay updated! Stay ads free
Browse CAclubindia ads free.
Latest updates on WA.
Daily E-Newsletter and much more.
CCI PRO annual subscription :
Original Price : INR 2999/-
Offer Price : INR 1999/-
Duration : 1 year
(Prices Inclusive of GST)
Know More
Note: If you are a PRO member already, please click here to login (for ad free experience)
Bimal Jain
Published in GST
Views : 215
downloaded 227 times
Comments
Trending Online Classes
-
DT & Audit (Exam Oriented Fastrack Batch) - For May 26 Exams and onwards Full English
CA Bhanwar Borana & CA Shubham Keswani -
IDT LIVE Exam Oriented Batch | May 2026, Sept 2026 & Jan 2027
CA Arpita Tulsyan
CAclubindia
