Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

A bank acting as per the remedies available to it under the SARFAESI Act for recovery cannot be termed as a dominant entity when it acts in accordance with provision thereof as it is acting in recovery of its funds/money in order to mitigate losses i

The AAR, Chhattisgarh in the matter of M/s Shanti Enggicon Private Limited [AdvanceRuling No. STC/AAR/09/2020 dated November 25, 2020] has ruled that Royalty amount is includable while arriving at the transaction value for payment of applicable Goods

The AAAR, Telangana in the matter of M/s Magnetic Infotech Private Limited [Order-in-Appeal No. AAAR/13/2022 dated November 22, 2022] has ruled that the sub-contractor is not entitled to claim Goods and Services Tax ("GST") exemption on services prov

The AAR, Maharashtra in the matter of M/s Mumbai Aviation Fuel Farm Facility Pvt. Ltd. [Order No. GST-ARA-126/2019-20/B-107 dated December 1, 2022] has ruled that, pipelines laid outside factory premises are not covered within term 'plant and machine

Assessment order passed under GST after death was invalid. Assessee was already dead as on the date of assessment order and therefore, the assessment orders is a nullity, and no other issues are decided by this Court and such other issues are left op

The Adjudicating Authority cannot direct a forensic audit and engage in a long-drawn pre-admission exercise which will have the effect of defeating the object of the �I&B Code,2016.

In the said judgment, SC reiterated the observations of its earlier judgement that a MOFS prepared after family arrangement was already made for the purpose of recording the information or for the information of the court, is not required to be regis

The Gujarat High Court held -that the Doctrine of Res Judicata not strictly applicable to Income Tax Proceedings yet in order to maintain consistency, theRevenue cannot be permitted to rake up stale issues again merely because the scope ofappeal is w

It was held that Share application money is capital borrowed for purpose of business or profession until shares are allotted.

The object of S. 143(1A) isthe prevention of evasion of tax - The burden of proving that the assessee has soattempted to evade tax is on the Revenue which may be discharged by establishingfacts and circumstances from which a reasonable inference can