Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India
Depreciation u/s 32
CA Nikita 05 October 2007 at 11:12
Depreciation u/s 32 - Deduction to be allowed even on 'passive' use of assets : ITAT Third Member
Section 115JB - Minimum Alternate tax
CA Nikita 04 October 2007 at 19:55
In the ITAT Jaipur Bench 'B' Maharaja Shree Umaid Mills Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle-6, Jaipur
Section 115JB, read with section 154, of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Ravikumar.G 04 October 2007 at 16:20
Section 115JB, read with section 154, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Minimum Alternate tax - Assessment year 2002-03 - Whether deferred tax liability is neither income-tax ‘paid’ or ‘payable’ nor a ‘provision’ against same, but it is nevertheless an a
Section 12AA, read with section 12A, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Charitable or religious trust - Registration procedure - Whether it is mandatory for Commissioner to dispose of application for registration under section 12A within six months from e
Section 5, read with sections 28(v) and 145, of the Income-tax Act, 1961
Ravikumar.G 04 October 2007 at 16:20
Section 5, read with sections 28(v) and 145, of the Income-tax Act, 1961 - Income - Accrual of - Assessment years 1998-99 to 2002-03 - Whether mere withdrawal by partners cannot be considered to be a method of accounting and amount, which is made unc
Section 80 IA ::
CA.Saibaburao Nanduri 02 October 2007 at 15:58
Held by the Hon`ble Court that, in the absence of any definition of the word manufacture one should appreciate the meaning as commonly understood by a reasonable person, form this point of view conversion of blank disc to a software loaded disc is cl
No re-assessment proceedings can be initiated so long as assessment proceedings are pending
CA Nikita 02 October 2007 at 14:17
Deduction u/s 80HHC can be allowed only if there is a positive profit
CA Nikita 30 September 2007 at 13:40
THIS is a rare case where the assessee lost consistently at all stages from AO, through, Commissioner (Appeals), ITAT, High Court and now the Supreme Court. For the assessment year 1992-93, the assessee appellant had claimed deduction under
CAclubindia
