Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This is an appeal by the assessee against order dated 04-01-2019 of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai for the assessment year 2009-10.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2010-11 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-58, Mumbai [CIT(A)], order dated 30/07/2019 in the matter of assessment framed by Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) u/s 143

This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-20, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)’] dated 30.08.2019 for Assessment Year (AY) 2016-17.

This appeal in ITA No.7111/Mum/2019 for A.Y.2013-14 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-3/IT-10174/2016-17 dated 19/09/2019 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the ex-parte order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-21, Mumbai [hereinafter referred to as the ‘CIT(A)’] dated 28.06.2019 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2014-15.

This appeal in ITA No.545/Mum/2021 for A.Y.2015-16 preferred by the order against the revision order of the ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-20, Mumbai u/s.263 of the Act dated 11/03/2021 for the A.Y.2015-16.

In NE Equipment Solution Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Tripura and Others [WP(C) No. 577/2021 dated August 24, 2021],NE Equipment Solution Pvt. Ltd. ("the Petitioner") approached the Hon'ble Tripura High Court primarily for release of the machinery which

In the case of M/S Online Cargo v. Commissioner of Customs [CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 51120 OF 2020], the Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("the CESTAT") passed an interim order dated August 27, 2021 quashing the Customs Commissioner

In Sourav Bajoria v. Union of India [Case No.: Bail Appln./1718/2021 dated August 23, 2021], Sourav Bajoria ("the Petitioner") has filed a petition seeking bail in connection with GST Case No. CGST/DGGI/GST/1928/2021, under Section 132(5) of Central

Learned counsel for the respondents prayed for time to file reply but did not dispute the aforesaid contentions of learned counsel for the petitioner that similar petitions have been entertained by other High Courts and interim protection has been gr