Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

This appeal by the Revenue is against the order dated 09.11.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-2, Nashik for assessment year 2008-09.

This appeal preferred by the assessee emanates from the order of the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Pune-3 dated 31.03.2021 for the assessment year 2014-15 as per the grounds of appeal on record.

In M/s Asian School of Media Studies v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax [Final Order Nos. 70251-70252 / 2021 dated November 11, 2021] Hon'ble Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad ("CESTAT") held that the service

In M/s Quest Engineers & Consultant Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax and Central Excise [Final Order No. 70226/2021 dated September 28, 2021] Hon'ble Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad ("CESTAT") held

In M/s Mahavir Nagar Shiv Srushti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. [GST-ARA-19/2021-22/B-94 dated November 10, 2021] Hon'ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling ("MAAR") held that repairs, renovations & rehabilitation services provided by housi

In Jenefa India vs. Union of India & Ors. [W.P.(MD) No.16770/2019 decided on October 5, 2021] Hon'ble Madras High Court upheld the validity of Sl. No.102 of Notification No. 2/2017 dated June 28, 2017("Goods Exemption Notification") over Clause (ii)

The Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in P.R Commissioner of Income Taxv. M/s United Spirits Ltd. [I.T.A. No. 548/2015 c/w I.T.A No. 37/2010 decided on September 2, 2021] answered in favor of the M/s United Spirits Ltd. ("the Assessee")and held that the

The Hon'ble Gauhati High Court in Krit Kunal Dhawan v. State of Assam and Ors. [WP(C)/5642/2021, dated October 29, 2021] held that in a case where assessee is accused of passing on fake Input Tax Credit ("ITC") without actual moment of goods, a reaso

The Hon'ble CESTAT observed that, the agreement between producer/distributor engaged in business of production and distribution of films and the Appellant is of such nature that both the parties work independently and does not interfere or influence

The Hon'ble Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling ("MAAR") held that though the Applicant is supplying pure services but has failed to satisfy that how her activities of providing residential accommodation to underprivileged girls is covered under