Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

In Rasi Nutri Foods [Order No. 39 AAR/2021 dated October 21, 2021] Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka ("KAAR") held that Notification 39/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated October 18, 2017 ("Concessional Rate Notification") read with G.O.M's No. 140

The Hon'ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi ("ITAT") in the matter of Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Pvt. Ltd. v.  ACIT, Circle: 4 (1) New Delhi [ITA. No. 477/Del/2021 dated November 09, 2021], directed the Assessing Officer ("AO") to delete

This Order disposes of the Show Cause Notice (SCN) No. IBBI/IP/INSP/2020/45 dated 01.04.2021 issued to Mr. Pawan Kumar Garg, R/o – 25-A, J-Pocket, Sheikh Sarai-II, New Delhi-110017 who is a Professional Member of Indian Institute of Insolvency Profes

Appeal filed under section 260A of Income Tax Act,1961

THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 19.06.2015

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 11.09.2015

In Kewal Krishan v. Rajesh Kumar & Ors. Etc. [Civil Appeal Nos. 6989-6992 of 2021 arising out of S.L.P. (C) Nos. 2033-2036 of 2016 dated November 22, 2021] Hon'ble Supreme Court held that the payment of price is an essential part of a sale covered by

In M/s Varun Beverages Ltd. v. Commissioner, Central Excise [Final Order No. 70253/2021 dated November 10, 2021] Hon'ble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Allahabad ("CESTAT") held that Nimbooz by 7 UP and Nimbus masala soda by 7 UP a

The AAR, West Bengal in response to Application presented by Mr. Vinayak Singh ("the Applicant") [Order No. 14/WBAAR/2021-22 dated October 8, 2021] has issued an advance ruling that the Applicant engaged in providing conservancy/solid waste managemen

In Uttaranchal Cable Network v. Commissioner, Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax [Order No. 51902/2021 dated October 13, 2021] Hon'ble Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ("CESTAT") held that the adjustment of the tax demand from the