Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nandlal Lohariya v. Jagdish Chand Purohit and Ors. [S.L.P. (C) Diary No. 24842 of 2020, decided on November 8, 2021] held that in each and every case where a litigant has lost the case on merits and is not guilty of negligenc
In M/s Alcoats [KAR ADRG 62/2021 dated October 29, 2021] Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling ("KAAR") held that job work services undertaken by M/s Alcoats ("the Applicant") by way of treatment or processing such as anodizing, plating, on the goo
Income Tax (“PCIT” in short ), Raipur-1 communicated to the assessee on 26.03.2021 passed under Sect ion 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
These two appeals by the Revenue arise out of the separate orders dated 28-10-2016 & 10-01-2017 passed by the CIT(A)-4, Pune in relation to the assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-1, Aurangabad on 23-06-2017 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.
This appeal by the assessee is directed against the final assessment order dated 09.12.2020 passed by the Assessing Officer (AO) u/s.143(3) r.w.s.144C(13) of the Income-tax Act, 1961
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 15.03.2018 for the assessment year 2008-09.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-1, Jodhpur (Camp at Jaipur) dated 18.12.2018 pertaining to assessment year 2012-13.
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of ld. CIT(A)-2, Jaipur dated 28.06.2019 pertaining to A.Y 2009-10 wherein the assessee has challenged the confirmation of levy of penalty u/s 271D of the Act.
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against order dated 21/09/2017 passed by the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax.
All Subjects Combo (Regular Batch) Jan & May 26