Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The CESTAT, Kolkata in the matter of M/s Sethia Oils Ltd. v Commissioner of CGST & Excise, Kolkata North [Final Order No.75397/2022 dated July 13, 2022] has held that rejection of refund claimed by the exporter on flimsy grounds would defeat the purp

The CESTAT, Delhi in the matter of M/s Mec Shot Blasting Equipment Ltd v Commissioner, CGST [ORDER NO. 50626 / 2022 dated July 18, 2022] has held thatthe service tax cannot be levied on the company for payment of rent to the director unless such prem

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the matter of M/s B.C.Mohan Kumarv Superintendent of Central Goods & ServiceTax [W.P. No. 13272 and WMP. Nos. 12569 & 12571 dated June 16, 2022] has held that the order for cancelling the GST registration must be aspe

We reiterate that we have left all the questions to be decided in the pending civil suit. Impugned orders passed by the NCLT as well as NCLAT are set aside, and the appeals are allowed to the aforesaid extent.

The CESTAT, Chennai Bench in the matter ofM/sInternational Seaport Dredging Pvt.Ltd vC ommissioner of GST & Central Excise [Order no. 40249 of 2022 dated, June 17, 2022] set aside the impugned order pertaining to the rejection of refund of unutilized

The CESTAT, Chennai in the matter ofM/s. Unimech Industries Private Limited vCommissioner of Central Excise [Excise Appeal No. 42787 of 2014 and 41588 of 2017 dated June 10, 2022] has held that the value of scrap arising during the process of manufac

The CESTAT, Chennai in the matter of M/s. SK Enterprises v The Commissioner of Customs [CUSTOMS APPEAL No. 40017 of 2022 dated June 24, 2022] set aside and held that the revaluation of the goods which are not subjected to Bureau of Indian Standards (

The Hon'ble High Court, New Delhi in the matter of M/s Zuric Traders v The Commissioner, Customs and Central Excise, Delhi and Anr [W.P.(C) 13911/2021 dated July 15, 2022] quashed the letter issued by the Revenue department for blocking assessee's ba

The Hon'ble Madras High Court in the matter of M/s Sridhar v the Superintendent of GST [Crl. O.P. No.7736 of 2022 dated June 6, 2022] dismissed the petition alleging the harassment by the Superintendent of Goods and Services Tax.

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of M/s. CADILA HEALTHCARE LTD v C.C.E. & S.T.-VADODARA-I [Excise Appeal No. 10100 of 2020 dated June 24, 2022] has held that assessee is not liable for payment of either excise duty or cenvat credit under Rule 6(3)