Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

 The term 'foreign contribution' is defined under Section 2(h) of FCRA to mean "the donation, delivery or transfer made by any foreign source - (i) of any article, not being an article given to a person as a gift for his personal use, if the market v

In the case of Tata Education and Development Trust (Taxpayer), the Mumbai Tribunal held that the amount spent for charitable purposes outside India, which is approved by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), is allowable as qualifying applicatio

This appeal by the Department is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals-2, Jaipur [Herein after referred to as ld. CIT(A) ]dated 10-12-2019 for the assessment year 2016-2017.]

In an action for infringement when the defendant’s trademark is identical with the plaintiff’s mark, the court will not enquire whether the infringement is such as is likely to deceive or cause confusion. But where the alleged infringement consists o

When a transport corporation hires a motor vehicle for use from its registered owner, the third-party insurance coverage will also be deemed to be transferred along with the vehicle, reiterated the Supreme Court in a recent decision. The person who i

Respectfully following the order of this Bench in the case of Sanjay Porwal vs CPC Bengaluru/ITO, Ward 6(4), Jaipur (supra), the disallowance made on account of employees contribution towards PF & ESI deposited before due date of filing of return of

The Madras High held that the aggrieved person cannot file claim petitions both under the Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 as well as the Workmen Compensation Act,1923 in respect of the very same accident. The court also held that previous decisions of vario

AO has no power to start fresh assessment in a case ,in which Hon’ble Tribunal has set aside order of AO, unless specific directions has been given in the order setting aside by appellate authority.

This appeal arises from a decision rendered by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ("NCDRC") on 19 September 2018. The NCDRC partly allowed the appeal filed by the insurer against a decision of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Co

This court is of the view that the impugned order passed by the Tribunal does not suffer from any legal infirmity warranting interference. The substantial question framed by this court while issuing notice is answered in the affirmative, that is, in