Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in Phillips Carbon Black Limited v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Vadodara-(ii) [Excise Appeal No. 10243 of 2019 dated April 29, 2022] set aside the order denying the CENVAT Credit to the assessee in respect of outward Goods Transport Agent ("G

Reservation is curse for our country. Our great Late Baba Saheb Ambedkar had approved reservations for a certain period only. But greedy politicians have extended year to year. The reservation system is killing intelligentsia of the country. Out Cons

The Hon'ble High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi in M/s. Godavari Commodities Ltd. vs. The State of Jharkhand [W.P.(T) No. 3908 of 2020 dated April 18, 2022], held that the Adjudication Order is non est in the eye of law, as the same has been passed wit

 The term 'foreign contribution' is defined under Section 2(h) of FCRA to mean "the donation, delivery or transfer made by any foreign source - (i) of any article, not being an article given to a person as a gift for his personal use, if the market v

In the case of Tata Education and Development Trust (Taxpayer), the Mumbai Tribunal held that the amount spent for charitable purposes outside India, which is approved by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), is allowable as qualifying applicatio

This appeal by the Department is directed against the order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeals-2, Jaipur [Herein after referred to as ld. CIT(A) ]dated 10-12-2019 for the assessment year 2016-2017.]

In an action for infringement when the defendant’s trademark is identical with the plaintiff’s mark, the court will not enquire whether the infringement is such as is likely to deceive or cause confusion. But where the alleged infringement consists o

When a transport corporation hires a motor vehicle for use from its registered owner, the third-party insurance coverage will also be deemed to be transferred along with the vehicle, reiterated the Supreme Court in a recent decision. The person who i

Respectfully following the order of this Bench in the case of Sanjay Porwal vs CPC Bengaluru/ITO, Ward 6(4), Jaipur (supra), the disallowance made on account of employees contribution towards PF & ESI deposited before due date of filing of return of

The Madras High held that the aggrieved person cannot file claim petitions both under the Motor Vehicles Act ,1988 as well as the Workmen Compensation Act,1923 in respect of the very same accident. The court also held that previous decisions of vario