Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court, in the case of M/s. Bhanjadeo Constructions v. State of Odisha & Others, [W.P.(C) No.38497 of 2021] granted major relief to contractors by staying the coercive steps against the contractors and ordered the State GST dep

The Telangana AAR, in lieu of an application filed by M/s. Bambino Pasta Food Industries Private Limited, [TSAAR Order No.52/2022] ruled that Corporate Social Responsibility ("CSR") expenditure for business is eligible for Input Tax Credit ("ITC").

The Hon'ble Orissa High Court ("the High Court"), in the case of M/s. Simon India Ltd. v. CT and GST Officer, Cuttack-II Circle, Cuttack and Anr. [W.P.(C) No. 26443 of 2022] ruled that, the final Goods and Services Tax ("GST") Audit Report shall be i

The Hon'ble Karnataka High Court in the case of Sri Kolapudi Enoch Washington v. The Additional Commissioner (GST and Central Tax), [Writ Petition No. 21269/2022 (T-RES)] directed the Goods and Services Tax ("GST") Department to restore the cancelled

This is a landmark judgement of the Apex Court in which it was held that the owner of the vehicle is expected to verify the driving skills and not run to the licensing authority to verify the genuineness of the driving license before appointing a dri

A truck driver murdered while he was in process of delivering the goods to the destined party has killed in the course of employment. Once relationship between an employee and employer established, then employer cannot deny payment of compensation to

The Tribunal held that the accident took place due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle as a result of which, the appellant sustained injuries and was awarded pecuniary as well as nonpecuniary damages.

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in the case of Basanta Kumar Shaw v. Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, Commercial Taxes and State Tax, [MAT 976 OF 2022 WITH CAN 1 OF 2022] held that in terms of Rule 86A(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules

The Hon'ble Gujarat High Court, in the case of Chromotolab and Biotech Solutions v. Union of India, [R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 16308 of 2020] ruled that the date of filing of the application by the assessee on common portal would be treated as

The CESTAT, New Delhi in the matter of M/s BBM Impex Pvt. Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) [Customs Early Hearing Application No.50414 of 2022 with Customs Appeal No. 51662 of 2022-SM] has held that, the appellant is entitled