Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Section 271(1)(c) cast responsibility upon the AO to reach the clear finding with respect to levy of penalty under the specific charge and if the AO fails to do so then the penalty cannot be levied as such penalty order shall not be maintainable in t

In this case the Hon'ble Apex Court explained term "Existence of Dispute" and used under provisions of Section 8 of the IBC,2016 related to  "Operational Debt".

The CESTAT, Allahabad in the matter of M/s. T.S. Motors India Private Ltd.v.Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Lucknow [Service Tax Appeal No. 70377 of 2018 dated June 17, 2022] set aside the order passed by Revenue Department demanding Service t

The Apex Court through this judgement cleared that a owner-driver cannot claim compensation under provisions of Sections 166 & 166A of the Motor Vehicles Act,1988 for his own fault where no other vehicle involved. A owner-driver cannot be himself cla

THE APEX COURT HELD that lender giving interest free loan to Corporate Debtor in case of non -payment of the same is a Financial Creditor and eligible to apply for initiation of insolvency process under IBC,2016.

The Hon’ble Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has allowed a plea filed by E& Y challenging the IT Department demand to pay Rs. 6.60 Crores as Tax.

The Hon’ble NCLAT full bench overturns its two previous judgements to clarify that Licensor for payment "License Fees" will be treated as Operational Creditor and "License Fees" is an Operational Debt.

The Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in Mr. Ramesh Kumar Patodia v. Citi Bank NA & Ors. [WPO 547 of 2019 dated June 24, 2022] held that interest component of Equated Monthly Instalments ("EMI") of the loan, through credit card services by a bank, attracts

The present Appeal has been filed by the Appellant w.r.t the NCLT, Chennai Bench (Tribunal) order who has dismissed the application of Appellant solely on the ground that the Appellant being preferential shareholders has no locus standi to file appli

The CESTAT, Ahmedabad in the matter of Ambica Engineering Works v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Surat-I [Excise Appeal No. 10859 of 2020, dated June 7, 2022] set aside the demand order has held that invoking extended limitation period by the Revenue Department cann