Judgements and Orders, Supreme Court and High courts of India

Refund should not be withheld due to some reason of technical glitch, system fails, mismatch of TDS etc. The Concerned AO must manually calculate the refund and release the refund. The computer system and auto-generation or any difficulty in doing so

The operative portion of the impugned order reads as under: "We are further of the view that Section 25 (2) (h) added on 23.11.2017 by way of amendment does not contemplate floating of any expression of interest. It is beyond our understanding as to

The burden lies on the insurance company to prove that licence of the driver of vehicle which met with an accident was fake, by examining the author of the document (RTO), and unless the same is proved as a fake document, the shifting of the liabilit

It is duty of IRP/IP to include all liabilities in the books of account of the Corporate Debtor, while preparing Information Memorandum and produce the same while putting before COC for approval. Any resolution plan which contravenes provisions of Se

SECTION 430 of the Companies Act, 2013- No civil court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or proceeding in respect of any matter which the Tribunal or the Appellate Tribunal is empowered to determine by or under this Act or any other law f

The non-compliances and irregularities or any illegal act already committed by the company cannot be ratified under the umbrella of "Scheme of Arrangements" as envisaged under Section 230-232 of the Companies Act, 2013.

NCLAT observed from the documentary evidence on record that no 'Charge' has been registered under Section 77(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Appellant 'Claim' was notsupported by the provisions under Regulation 21 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board

The Discretionary Power of Directors to refuse 'Transfer of Shares' is not to be resorted to in a deliberate or arbitrary fashion but in good faith. The Directors are to give due weightage to shareholder's right to transfer his share.

The CESTAT bench of Ahmedabad ("the Tribunal") in the case of Marwadi Shares & Finance Ltd. v. C.C.E &S.T.-Rajkot (Service Tax Appeal No. 12087 of 2017) held that the Service Tax is not liable to be paid on the amount collected from the customer as i

The Hon'ble Bombay High Court ("the High Court") in the case of M/s. Euro Pratik Sales Corporation [W.P No.3380 OF 2022dated November 17,2022] allowed Petitioner to submit a physical application for restoration of Goods and Services Tax ("GST") regis