This appeal at the instance of the assessee is directed against CIT(A)’s order dated 27.07.2021. The relevant assessment year is 2019-2020.
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-13, Ahmedabad [“CIT(A)” in short] dated 25.03.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2016-17.
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-5), Vadodara [“CIT(A) in short] dated 25.02.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2012-13.
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-5), Vadodara [“CIT(A) in short] dated 25.02.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2012-13.
The assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against the order of learned Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals-5), Vadodara [“CIT(A) in short] dated 25.02.2019 passed for Assessment Year 2012-13.
Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-4, Ahmedabad dated 21.1.2019 passed for the Asstt.Year 2014-15.
Assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal against order of the ld.CIT(A)-5, Ahmedabad dated 25.02.2019 passed for the Asstt.Year 2015-16.
The ld.CIT(A)-XI, Ahmedabad has decided appeal of the assessee for the Asstt.Year 2009-10 vide order dated 12.11.2012.
The AAR, Madhya Pradesh in the matter of M/S. Mohammad Arif Mohammad Latif (Advance Ruling Order No. 03/2021 dated June 17, 2021) held that, that mere acceptance of joint custody of goods without rights, privileges of ownership of goods does not amou
The AAR, Madhya Pradesh in the matter of M/S. Bharat Oman Refineries Limited [Advance Ruling Order No. 02/2021 dated June 7, 2021] held that, GST is applicable on payment of notice pay by an employee to employer in lieu of notice period and telephone
Live Course on Invoice Management System (IMS) - 2nd Batch(With Recording)
CAclubindia
