For all those who are literally ignorant of the concept of Pre - acqusition dividend, eat this. The below mentioned highlighted lines in yellow are from the Institutes study material (CA final new syllabus - Financial reporting volume 1- Page No- 5.16). This concept applies also to those who are shouting that it is confused. Get a life..
2.6 DIVIDEND RECEIVED FROM SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
The holding company, when it receives a dividend from a subsidiary company, must
distinguish between the part received out of capital profits and that out of revenue profits
the former is credited to Investment Account, it being a capital receipt, and the latter is
adjusted as revenue income for being credited to the Profit & Loss Account. It must be
understood that the term ‘capital profit’, in this context, apart from the generic meaning of the term, connotes profit earned by the subsidiary company till the date of acquisition. As a result, profits which may be of revenue nature for the subsidiary company, may be capital profits so far as the holding company is concerned. If the controlling interest was acquired during the course of a year, profit for that year must be apportioned into the pre-acquisition and post-acquisition portions, on the basis of time in the absence of information on the point.
Illustration 6
H Ltd. acquired 3,000 shares in S Ltd., at a cost of Rs. 4,80,000 on 1st August, 2006. The capital of S Ltd. consisted of 5,000 shares of Rs. 100 each fully paid. The Profit & Loss Account of this company for 2006 showed an opening balance of Rs. 1,25,000 and profit for the year of Rs. 3,00,000. At the end of the year, it declared a dividend of 40%. Record the entry in the books of H Ltd., in respect of the dividend.
Solution
The profits of S Ltd., have to be divided between capital and revenue profits from the point of view of the holding company.
Capital Profit Revenue Profit
Rs. Rs.
Balance on 1.1.2006 1,25,000 —
Profit for 2006 (3,00,000 × 7/12) 1,75,000 (3,00,000×5/12) 1,25,000
Total 3,00,000 1,25,000
Proportionate share of H Ltd. (3/5) 1,80,000 75,000
The treatment of the dividend of Rs. 1,20,000 received by H Ltd., will depend on the
character of profits which have been utilised by S Ltd., to pay the dividend. There are four possibilities:
(1) Earlier profits, included in the profit brought forward from the previous year have been used up first. In that case, the dividend of Rs.1,20,000 would be paid wholly out of capital or pre-acquisition profits. The entry in that case will be:
Rs. Rs.
Bank Account Dr. 1,20,000
To Investment Account 1,20,000
(2) The profit for 2006 alone has been utilised to pay the dividend, and no part of the profit brought forward has been utilised for the purpose. The share of H Ltd., in profit for the first seven months of S Ltd., is Rs. 1,05,000 i.e., Rs. 1,75,000 × 3/5 and that the profit for the remaining five months is Rs. 75,000. The dividend of Rs. 1,20,000 will be adjusted in this ratio: Rs. 70,000 out of profits up to the lst August and Rs. 50,000 out of profits after that date. The dividend out of profits subsequent to August 1st will be revenue income and that out of earlier profits capital receipt. Hence the entry.
Rs. Rs.
Bank Dr. 1,20,000
To Investment Account 70,000
To Profit and Loss Account 50,000
(3) Later profits have been utilised first and then pre- acquisition profits. In such a case, the whole of Rs. 75,000 (share of H Ltd. in profits of S Ltd., after 1st August) would be received and treated as revenue income; the remaining dividend, Rs. 45,000 (Rs. 1,20,000 less Rs. 75,000) would be capital receipt. The entry would be:
Rs. Rs.
Bank Dr. 1,20,000
To Investment Account 45,000
To Profit & Loss Account 75,000
(4) The two profits, pre-and post-acquisition, have been used up proportionally. The ratio
would be Rs. 1,80,000 : 75,000; 1,20,000 ×75 000
______
2 55 000
would be revenue receipt and the remaining capital. The entry would be:
Rs. Rs.
Bank Dr. 1,20,000
To Investment Account 84,706
To Profit & Loss Account 35,294
Notes:
(1) Points (3) and (4) above can arise only if there is definite information about the profits
utilised; in practice such treatment is rare.
(2) The treatment outlined above in fact is not peculiar to holding companies-dividends
received out of profits earned before purchase of investments normally also are credited
to the Investment Account. For instance, if shares in X Ltd., are purchased in January,
2006 and in April X Ltd., declares a dividend in respect of 2005, the dividend received by
the holder of the shares correctly should not be treated as income but as capital receipt,
and credited to Investment Account.
(3) The holding company, like other holders, records no entry on issue of bonus shares by the subsidiary company - only the number of shares held is increased.