Wasn't law paper of may 16 unfair? hope the results are not!

Dear Messi, glad that Sfm paper was easy for you

Kudos for your efforts

I have not complained about Sfm paper bcoz i know that my preparation for Sfm was not upto the mark.

So i accept that it is my fault that the paper went tough for me.

However, what i am saddened is about how inspite of putting so much efforts and practice i was not able to write the Law paper.

I feel that the institute has the right to set tough questions, but they must give a fair chance for the students to complete the paper and also give appropriate marks as per their answers (which i personnaly feel is not being followed)

Correction : However, what i am saddened is about how inspite of putting so much efforts and practice i was not able to write the Law paper properly* 

Originally posted by : Priyansh
	law was though and I don't see a point in asking questions which involves dates , turnover limits , I mean which CA doesn't refer to books or other materials when necessary, they should check the intellect not the mug up capacity

Very true , one hand they tell that we must not mug up,

and on the other, they frame questions which require a lot of rote learning

Anyways, lets hope the results are not unfair like the paper

Thanks Dharmesh for your feedback and best wishes

Omg 11.36 % both groups..18% in each group good results this time