journal entries to vat
on due date
vat payable a/c Dr
to vat receivable a/c Cr
to cash ( if any) Cr
what are the jounal entries when input tax credit is adjusted like ( input tax credit taken on common inputs ),,
CA Krishna Chaitanya M (Chartered Accountant) (463 Points)
22 August 2011journal entries to vat
on due date
vat payable a/c Dr
to vat receivable a/c Cr
to cash ( if any) Cr
what are the jounal entries when input tax credit is adjusted like ( input tax credit taken on common inputs ),,
Sumit Grover
(Chartered Accountant )
(3652 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
the entry passed by you is already covering the adjusment of Input tax credit..........
plz elaborate or clarify ur query
CA Krishna Chaitanya M
(Chartered Accountant)
(463 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
at the time of purchase entry is
purchases a/c Dr
vat receivable a/c Dr
to creditors a/c Cr
at the time of sale is
debtors a/c Dr
to sales a/c cr
to vat payable a/c cr
on due date of payment of vat adjusting entry is
vat payable a/c Dr
to vat Receivable a/c Cr
to cash a/c cr
however some common inputs used in exempted goods and taxable goods sales in those circumstances, vat taken on common input is reduced, at the time of purchase we already taken total input tax credit, so on due date vat receivable amount is reduced , i want such reduced amount treatment in books of accounts of assesse
Sumit Grover
(Chartered Accountant )
(3652 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
i thnk in dat case , the entry should be----
Debit balance written off A/c Dr. Proportionate amount
to Vat receivable A/c
plz correct me if m wrng
CA Krishna Chaitanya M
(Chartered Accountant)
(463 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
if those reduced amount is charged to capital account, proprietors or partners capital account, it makes any difference?
Sumit Grover
(Chartered Accountant )
(3652 Points)
Replied 22 August 2011
it cant be done.....
since such reversal has to be shown as exp in P&L, coz earlier such part of cost couldnt b recognised in d same......
so, it cant be set off against capital a/c.....since it has nothng to do wid dat.......
plz correct me if m wrng
CMA Shilpa Shinde
(COST ACCOUNTANT)
(217 Points)
Replied 24 August 2011
Accounting for VAT & CST |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Background
VAT intends to bring harmonization in the tax structure of various States and rationalize the overall tax burden. The essence of VAT is that it provides credit/set-off for input tax, i.e., tax paid on purchases, against the output tax, i.e., tax payable on sales. To reconcile the details submitted in monthly/ quarterly / half yearly return and actual details prevailing as on 31/03/2XXX it is very much imperative to account for VAT Payable, VAT Set Off (on purchases, Expenses and capital goods), set Off used against payment of CST in a systematic and consistent manner to avail the benefit of Set Off. Sometimes due to wrong accounting Set Off is forgone while filing the return.
Let me illustrate how set off is beneficial.
Case 1: Set Off on Expenses is taken. (exclusive method of accounting is followed)
Vat payable 18750
Set Off
On Purchases 13750
On Expenses 6250
Set Off Available 20000
Set off Utilized for Vat 12.5% on sales 18750 18750 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CST Payable 1400
Set Off Available 20000
Set off Utilized for Vat 12.5% on sales 18750
Set off Available 1250
Set off utilized for CST 2% on Sales 1250
CST Payable 150
Following Journal Entries will have to be passed.
1. Local Sales
Debtors A/c Dr. 168750
To Sales 12.5% 150000
To Vat 12.5%(Sales) 18750
2. Interstate Sales
Debtors A/c Dr. 71400
To Sales 2%(CST) 70000
To CST 2%(Sales) 1400
3. Local Purchases
Purchases 12.5% Dr. 110000
VAT 12.5%(Purchases) Dr. 13750
To Creditors 123750
4. Interstate Purchases
Purchases 2%(OMS) Dr. 40000
CST 2%(Purchases) Dr. 800
To Creditors 40800
5. Expenses
Expenses Dr. 50000
Vat 12.5%(Expenses) Dr. 6250
To Creditors for Expenses 56250 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6.Transfer VAT liability to VAT Payable A/c.
Vat 12.5%(Sales) Dr. 18750
To Vat Payable 18750
(Note: Pass any other VAT liability say VAT 4%,
1%, to Vat Payable A/c)
7. Transfer VAT Set Off to VAT Set Off A/c.
Vat Set Off A/c Dr. 20000
To Vat 12.5%(Purchases) 13750
To Vat 12.5%(Expenses) 6250
(Note: Pass any other VAT set off to Vat Set Off
A/c. Say Set off taken on capital assets)
8. Transfer CST Liability to CST Payable A/c
CST 2%(Sales) Dr. 1400
To CST Payable A/c 1400
At the time of making payment pass following entries.
9. Payment Entry for VAT liability
Vat Payable Dr. 18750
To Vat Set Off 18750
(Note: if Vat Set Off< Vat Payable. Credit
Cash/Bank A/c for the difference)
10. Payment Entry for CST Liability
CST Payable Dr. 1400
To Vat set Off 1250
To Cash/Bank/ 150
NOTE: CST paid on inter state purchases can not be claimed as set off, due to following reasons.
If credit is given for CST paid in OMS purchases then state (in which goods are purchased) will have to part with its revenue from its treasury which no state will accept. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due to above fact CST paid on purchases should be added to purchases while making financial statement. This will not lead into inconsistency in accounting on the ground that purchases are recorded inclusive of CST whereas sales are recorded exclusive of CST because set off on such purchases can not be claimed and is non refundable duty so there is no harm in claiming such CST paid as expenses. Alternatively it could be shown as expenses in the Profit and Loss A/c.
However if above accounting is adhered to then differential liability of vat and cst at any time during the year is known. If any entries remains to be passed in the previous period which comes to the notice after return is filed then it becomes very easy to revise the return if changes are substantial or incorporate such changes in the return of next period.
Profit and Loss Account As On 31.03.2XXX
Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2XXX
Tax Liability under income tax
Net Profit for the Year 19200
Tax Payable Comes to @ 30.9% 5933
So, Total Tax Paid:
Income Tax 5933
Vat NIL
Cst 150
Total Paid 6083
Case 2: Set Off on Expenses is not taken. (Exclusive method of accounting is followed.)
Vat payable 18750
Set Off
On Purchases 13750
Set Off Available 13750
Set off Utilized for Vat 12.5% on sales 13750 13750
Vat Payable comes to 5000
CST Payable 1400
Set Off Available 13750
Set off Utilized for Vat 12.5% on sales 13750
Set off Available NIL
Set off utilized for CST 2% on Sales NIL |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
All the Journal Entries passed in case 1 will have to be passed except changes in following entries.
5. Expenses
Expenses (50000+6250) Dr. 56250
To Creditors for Expenses 56250
7. Transfer VAT Set Off to VAT Set Off A/c.
Vat Set Off A/c Dr. 13750
To Vat 12.5% (Purchases) 13750
(Note: Pass any other VAT set off to Vat Set Off
A/c. Say Set off taken on capital assets)
9. Payment Entry for VAT liability
Vat Payable Dr. 18750
To Vat Set Off 13750
To Cash/Bank 5000
10. Payment Entry for CST Liability
CST Payable Dr. 1400
To Cash/Bank/ 1400
Profit and Loss Account As On 31.03.2XXX
Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2XXX
Tax Liability under income tax
Net Profit for the Year 12950
Tax Payable Comes to @ 30.9% 4002
So, Total Tax Paid:
Income Tax 4002
Vat 5000
Cst 1400
Total Paid 10422
Inference
Tax Paid when set off is not claimed 10422
Tax Paid when set off is claimed 6083
Tax Savings if Set Off is claimed 4339 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Case 3: Set Off on Expenses is taken.
(inclusive method of accounting is followed u/s 145A)
Profit and Loss Account As On 31.03.2XXX
Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2XXX
Case 4: Set Off on Expenses is not taken.
(inclusive method of accounting is followed u/s 145A)
Profit and Loss Account As On 31.03.2XXX
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet as on 31.03.2XXX
Inference:
Tax liability will not alter whether inclusive or exclusive method is followed.
See Case 1 and Case 3.
See Case 2 and Case 4.
1. When Assets is sold on which Vat is collectible.
Gross amount is received Rs. 50000 on sale of Car.
Bank A/c Dr. 50000
To Car A/c 44444
To Vat 12.5%(Sales Others) 5556
2. Transfer VAT liability to VAT Payable A/c.
Vat 12.5%(Sales Assets) Dr. 5556
To Vat Payable A/c 5556
3. Purchases of New Motor Car
New Motor Car A/c Dr. 909784
Vat 12.5% (Purchases Assets) Dr. 102211
To Bank 1011995
4. Transfer above VAT Set Off to VAT Set Off A/c.
Vat 12.5%(Purchases Assets) Dr. 102211
To Vat Set off A/c 102211
5. Expenses on which Set Off is claimed subject to reduction.
Expenses incurred for packing of Tax Free Goods.
Net 1000
Vat 12.5% 125
Total 1125
(a)Expenses A/c Dr. 1000
Vat 12.5%(Expenses) Dr. 125
To Creditors For Expenses 1125
(b)Expenses A/c Dr. 20
To Vat 12.5%(Expenses) 20
(Reversal of Vat Set off to the extent of 2%)
(125/12.5*2=Rs.20/-)
6. Treatment of Output Tax on Debtors becoming insolvent.
Sales 12.5% 100000
Vat 12.5% 12500
On sale of goods
Debtors A/c Dr. 112500
To Sales 12.5% 100000
To Vat 12.5% 12500
On Debtors becoming insolvent
Vat 12.5% Dr. 12500
Bad Debts Dr. 100000
To Debtors 112500
7. Interstate Sales Return after 6 months.
OMS Sales 2% 10000
CST 2% 200
CST/Vat collected and paid to government is not reversible if goods are returned beyond 6 months.
Sales 2%(CST) Dr. 10000
To Debtors 10000 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AS 9 and IAS 18
AS- 9 on Revenue Recognition is silent regarding treatment of Revenue from sales. However IAS 18 on Revenue clarify that amounts collected on behalf of third parties such as Sales tax, Service Tax, Excise Duty should be excluded from revenue.
AS-2, Section 145A and Clause 12(b) of form 3CD.
AS-2 states that the costs of purchase and value of closing stock in trade consist of the purchase price including duties and taxes (other than those subsequently recoverable by the enterprise from the taxing authorities) freight inwards and other expenditure directly attributable to the acquisition
Section 145A states that purchases and sales are recorded inclusive of any tax and duty.
Clause 12(b) of form 3CD asking for Details of deviation, if any, from the method of valuation prescribed under section 145A, and the effect thereof on the profit or loss.
However Section 145A for Tax Audit purpose is deviated if exclusive method of accouting is followed. However the ultimate profitability will not be altered in either case.(see case 1 and case 3 OR case 2 and case 4).
Conclusion:
So in general abovementioned accounting is considered for recording local and interstate transaction. If VAT Act of particular state requires some specific treatment then that is to be followed. For instance in some state Vat Set off on purchases of fixed assets available immediately whereas in some other state it is available over a period of time |
CMA Shilpa Shinde
(COST ACCOUNTANT)
(217 Points)
Replied 24 August 2011
CMA Shilpa Shinde
(COST ACCOUNTANT)
(217 Points)
Replied 24 August 2011
Dinesh Kumar Agarwal
(Article clerk)
(117 Points)
Replied 26 August 2011
you are saying that part on input vat not treated for input tax credit. It should be charged to profit & loss account under the head cost of goods sold. Since vat amount not eligible for credit should be added to purchase cost. It should not be directly transferred to capital a/c. because in later case profit for thear may gone up by such amount.
CA Harshit Mehta
(PROPRIETOR)
(65 Points)
Replied 16 July 2012
To, shilpa shinde,
in example , there is mistake in case 3 - in balance sheet :-
there should be 150 for bank overdraft instead of 6400.