I'm totally in favour of being Indian and sticking to our sentiments and our culture. But when addressing a Chartered Accountant, the very use of CA as a title is respect enough in my eyes as I hold the profession very highly and the profession doesn't need the aid of Shri to add to the respect factor in addressing a person. Using ji in a name looks more like, "I know this person so well" or "I know this person personally too so I'm showing respect" and I think can be avoided.
Also, it isn't used specifically for senior members of the profession or distinguished members of the fraternity anymore. It is used rampantly for every person called on stage.
Use of bouquets is another culture, as rightly pointed out above, that is okay if done for someone from outside the fraternity, for example, a member of the CBDT or a foreign counterpart of the profession, a renowned member of the industry who has come to address us, etc. but it doesn't make sense to do it for every council member on stage, be it regional or central and every person who wishes to address the seminar.
I think such actions degrade us as professionals and tend to look like they are politically motivated (I could be wrong here). I would appreciate if some senior member notices this and comments on this with his views or takes it up with the council.
Also, I would like this to remain only a discussion and not taken personally by anyone.