Think Twice to advise CA as career, to start practice, to apply Bank Concurrent Audit/to participate in Tenders
Dear CA,
I qualified CA in 1985. After 30 years , -----
Think Twice to advise a student to pursue CA.
Think Twice to start/opt Practice.
Think Twice to Apply Bank Concurrent Audit/ to participate in a Tender.
- Before advising any student to Join CA Course, I have been explaining the Opportunities for a Practicing CA and Employee CA duly drawing Comparison of 1985 and 2015.
Employment:
2015>At present majority are opting for employment.
In 1986, first I applied for Employment in a Public Sector Company as well a Professionally managed, diversified, Listed Private Sector company. Both paid me 1st Class Train fare and Lodging , Boarding for attending interviews at New Delhi and Nagpur respectively . Public Sector Top officials who interviewed assured me that the Salary Scales are under revision and I can expect more than the Scale advertised .
Present: ICAI has taken the initiative of Capmus Selections, good initiative. Before that for some years , Newly Qualified has to apply to different companies, incur travelling, lodging and boarding from pocket besides – one date , 2 or more companies at different places – impossible to attend – may not get the employment in which interview attended and missed the other company also , due to absent.
- Practice:
In 1985 majority opted for practice. Some of my good friends working in Public Sector Banks, Public / Private Sector Undertakings quit the employment , started their own practice.
Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 gave good professional opportunity , differentiated CAs , particularly in mofussil/taluk / district head quarters from ITPs and Tax Advocates.
Sunrise Profession.
I try to be an Optimist but not a pessimist , -----
Recent Observations:
Practicing son/daughter opting for employment.
Leading South Indian CA Firm branch –in-Charge , an MBA from USA and also a CS , good academic record, quit practice and opted for employment after more than 2 decades practice.
Competition Commission Of India. Tendering System . News items CAs quoting as low as Rs 45 for Audit of a Sarva Siksha Abhiyaan account in AP , Rs 100 for Audit of a Village Account in MP.
Recently, I attended Technical and Fiancial Bid opening of a State Government Undertaking. The Minimum Bid is Rs 2,00,000. Out of about 120 Bids , about 100 are for the Minimum Bid and one is for Rs 50,00,000 some are even below Minimum Bid. The GM , a CS/CMA, informed that for a No Profit/No Loss situation, Bid has to be for a Minimum of Rs 4,00,000 and in 2nd Year there may be some surplus as Study of organization helps saving man days . He wondered , CAs are trying through Politicians do it even for Rs 50,000 and For Free also stating they will have Experience in their Resume.
We are doing, along with 2 digit number of CA firms, Internal Audit of a State Government Undertaking and Fees last REVISED more than 6 years Ago. Inflation ?
The Companies Act,2013 – but for some changes by Companies(Amendement) Act,2015 , some Rules , Forms modified, 8 Member committee appointed , a Ray of Hope, …???
A large Bank called for Applications for Allotment of Concurrent Audit.
In my opinion, better to Think Twice , to apply this. We may not get Fees and No Wonder , if we end up paying to the Bank. I herwith attach the Fee Cuts , and a Summary is as follows:
Fees as per Scheme :
Sl No |
Nature of Lapse/Shortcoming |
Measure |
Penalty-Rs |
1 |
Audit Staff absent for 6 days |
6days* Rs 1,000 *2 |
12,000 |
2 |
Leakage not pointed in time |
Max 20% of Fees |
6,000 |
3 |
Lacunae in Systems not pointed out |
Max 5% of Fees |
1,500 |
4 |
Frauds not detected |
Max 25% of Fees |
7,500 |
5 |
Scrutiny failure |
Max 5% of Fees |
1,500 |
6 |
Delay in submission of report |
Max 10% of Fees |
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
End of the Month, CA to pay ? Face the threat of Termination ?
Attachment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
SN |
Coverage Area |
Scope of work expected from Service Provider /CA Firm |
Quantum of Measurement |
Penalty to be imposed (For Service Provider / CA Firm) |
1. |
Attendance at The Work Area. |
Attending branch/unit on daily basis, by Representative of the Service Provider /CA Firm, and 2-3 times a week by the Partner of the Firm. |
Days of Absence in a month in attending the branch/unit (i) by the representative of the Service provider / Firm or (ii) by the Partner of the Firm |
Twice the proportionate remuneration of the month on a pro-rata basis for the days of absence. Eg.30 days in a month; Remuneration of Rs.30000/-p.m. with an absence of 2days:Penalty to be charged : Rs.2000x2= Rs.4000. |
For Non-detection/ non-reporting: 1% of the amount, in the area of incomeLeakagenotdetected/ reported. i.e. (i) Processing Fee (ii) Upfront Fee (iii) BG/LC Comm. (iv) Locker rent etc., (Overall cap for both not to exceed 20% of monthly remuneration). Eg. Processing Fee of Rs. 1 lac. is identified by an Auditor other than CA. after 2 weeks of its becoming due. Penalty will be Rs.1000 for one instance.If such instances are more, then overall cap of 20% of remuneration i.e.Rs.6000 (20% of 30000) to be charged. |
Rs.250/- per major lacunae in an account with a maximum penalty of 5% of monthly remuneration. |
2. |
Detection Income Leakage |
of |
On a day to day basis income leakage, if any detected, to be reported. |
Non-detection/ non-reporting / short recovery of income leakage from the date it becomes due within a period of 2 weeks. The penalty to be levied is on account of opportunity loss for the Bank. |
3. |
Detection of Major lacunae in the conduct of the account, systems& procedures etc., |
Failureto comment on Frauds, which maycause loss to the Bank. |
Detailed Scrutinyof Accounts and submission of observations. |
Timely detection lacunae. |
of |
major |
Nondetectionofmajor lacunae as enumerated in the CRM Value Statements of WBCAS. |
4. |
Detection/ Reporting of Fraud. |
Non detection/ not reporting of Fraud arising on account of failure in implementation of systems & procedures and security lapses. |
10% of monthly remuneration per instance, with a cap of 25% of monthly remuneration. |
5. |
Detailed Scrutiny of Accounts within a reasonable time and submission of observations online on a daily basis. |
Detailed scrutiny of accounts by commenting as per Value Statementsmentionedin WBCAS, if not done: Eg. All accounts within 3 months and thereafter once, at the time of renewal/ review/ new sanction; |
Rs.250/ per account with an overall capof5%ofthemonthly remuneration. |
6. |
Submission of Monthly / Qly. Concurrent Audit Reports
|
Unacceptable delay in the performance of obligations. |
MonthlyReportstobe submitted within a week of the succeeding month to the BM/HeadoftheUnit. Thereafter, with their remarks to nd RM/DGM (BO) within 2 week of the succeeding month of report. |
Non submission schedule. |
as |
per |
Non Submission: 10% of Audit Fee p.m. Non submission by over 3 months: Termination of the Contract giving one Month’s notice. Delayed Submission: Rs.250/ per day till submission. (With a overall cap of 10% of monthly remuneration p.m.) |
7. |
Should be done in accordance with the time schedule specified in the Agreement. |
Identified areas of deficiency in performance: (i) Partner‟s not attending branch/ unit 2-3 times a week; (ii)Non-deputationof representative every day; (iii)Non-submissionof Reports; (iv) Non-detection of Income leakage in time, resulting in opportunity loss; & (v) Non-detection/reporting of Frauds. (vi) Poor Quality of Reports. |
Termination of Contract, by giving a month's notice, as per Service Level Agreement (SLA). |