Ad-Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your mobile. Subscribe Now!

Tds correction f.y.2012-2013

Mohan (Audit Assisstant & Accounts Manager) (489 Points)

24 February 2016

24Q/4Q/FY 12-13 original return was filed. Default generated wherein there are certain challans which are shown under matched challan category as 'matched and consumed' as well as under unmatched challan catergory but with different deposit dates. These unmatched challans cannot be tagged since there are no challans available for tagging (challans already matched and consumed). Help desk asked to pay amount equivalent of unmatched challans and adjust in +1/-1 year. But this solution is impractical and irrational. What remedy is available?

Reply
Follow
Share

6 Replies

ujjaishravan (accountant) (212 Points)
Replied 25 February 2016

Originally posted by : e.filer B.Com/ Hyderabad
	what the help desk said is correct. Do not say it is impractical and irrational. If it is mere wrong entree then the correct challan must have existed there and left unconsumed. That original chalan was already consumed now u payY.....

though we are paying now, we can adjust challan for +1/-1 f-y, how to rectify earlier years, thats challenging.,

challan correction now we can do only online. but the online challan addition takes challan for +1/-1 Fy olny. in this case FY 2011-12, there must be unconsumend challan exists in 2010-11 or 2011-12 or 2012-13. the dropdown list box wont show 2015-16 challans.

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

ujjaishravan (accountant) (212 Points)
Replied 25 February 2016

O.M.G., this thing has not striked to me., thanks for reminding.,

Mohan (Audit Assisstant & Accounts Manager) (489 Points)
Replied 25 February 2016

My comment about impractical and irrational has been taken very personally by e.filier, however I am right in saying that the solution given by helpdesk is very much impractical and irrational. The reason is also mentioned in my query that 'there is no challan available for tagging because all challans are matched and consumed. There are no matched unconsumed challans present for consuming or tagging either in +1/-1 years or against matched unconsumed challans. Original TDS return filed by my client reflects reporting of the same challans only once whereas while doing online correction I found same challans wrongly reflected under both categories (matched challans as well as unmatched challans) with different dates. Its a clear mistake not done by my client in his TDS return. Why my client should pay the same amount twice for the error caused due to wrong reporting by either bank/NSDL or TDSCPC? Isn't any remedy available? Because the amount is huge and management is not redy to pay the amount twice, can any application to AO or higher authority filed for this. Even AO was surprised when the whole thing was described to him and he asked to come back on other date.

ujjaishravan (accountant) (212 Points)
Replied 25 February 2016

I've just rectify this kind of error for my friend's client. It involves little trick of onsite programming and it would cost Re.1 per challan for every challans(for whatever amount) in unmatched challan tab.,

and its not a treces site mistake it will be clearly client's mistake only.

If you're ok., then you can outsource it to me., any way you can come in my PM also., but through text it is not that much possible to make you understand.

Mohan (Audit Assisstant & Accounts Manager) (489 Points)
Replied 25 February 2016

Well, I am confident that there is no mistake in the TDS return filed by my client because the details reflected on provisional receipt, form 27A and form 26Q are matching as per the TDS liability and challans paid by client.

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

ujjaishravan (accountant) (212 Points)
Replied 26 February 2016

Guys., there is nothing to worry about., pay Re.1/- in one challan after three days it will appear in traces. Tag the unmatched challan to this Re.1 challan., thats all problem solved., Why meeting with AO.