TDS on vehicle hire
You had indicated that even payment for hiring of vehicles would now require tax deduction at source under Sec. 194-I, which was hitherto limited to immovable property.
But I may draw your attention to the clarification issued in Circular No.558 dated March 28, 1990 (1990) 183 ITR (St.) 158, wherein the Board has conceded that where a vehicle is given on hire along with the provision of a driver and a conductor with the remuneration for use being fixed for the number of hours such vehicle is made available, it is a service contract for carrying out the work, so that it will be covered under Sec. 194C.
It will, therefore, appear that Sec. 194-I, which will now cover amount of rent or any other payment for the use of any plant, machinery or equipment which will no doubt include vehicles, should be treated as confined to a case where vehicle alone is given on hire and not where service by running the vehicle is made available.
The circular referred to by the reader is one issued prior to the amendment to Sec. 194-I with effect from July 14, 2006, specifically making any rent or hire or any other compensation for use of plant, machinery or equipment for tax deduction under Sec. 194-I. The issue is whether it is a case of hiring out a vehicle or rendering a service by making available the vehicle.
These are two distinct contracts. There is, therefore, justification for reader's inference that, where the vehicle is made available as a matter of service, the Board's Circular No.558 dated March 29, 1990 (1990) 183 ITR (St.) 158 would continue to have application. The Circular has not been revoked. At any rate, the reasoning in the Circular would indicate that the inference drawn therein does not get superseded by the amendment, which cannot cover what is squarely a service contract for work so that in such cases tax deduction should continue to be governed by Sec. 194C and not under Sec. 194-I.
It may also be noticed that Explanation III inserted under Sec. 194C(2) deems work to include "carriage of goods and passengers by any mode of transport other than by railways". This amendment made with effect from July 1, 1995, which is subsequent to the Circular, supports the Circular and buttresses the reader's inference. Such transport contract and not mere contract of vehicle can be understood as being governed by Sec. 194C(2) Explanation III, which being a special clause should override Sec. 194-I.
Akashdeep Singh