Dear Mr Agarwal,
I am reproducing the section hereunder:
(13A) any special allowance specifically granted to an assessee by his employer to meet expenditure actually incurred on payment of rent (by whatever name called) in respect of residential accommoda- tion occupied by the assessee, to such extent as may be prescribed having regard to the area or place in which such accommodation is situate and other relevant considerations.]
[Explanation.—For the removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that nothing contained in this clause shall apply in a case where—
(a) the residential accommodation occupied by the assessee is owned by him ; or
(b) the assessee has not actually incurred expenditure on payment of rent (by whatever name called) in respect of the residential accommodation occupied by him ;]
There are only two exceptions in the section.
The owner is the wife and the tenant is the husband.
Will it change the position if some X is the tenant in that house? As owner of the property she would have shown the rent received in her income tax return and Mr. X would have claimed HRA in his return.
I believe the confusion arose because the transaction is between husband and wife.
G. Padmanabhan