according to me abnormal stipend income have to be taxable on the principal of natural justice. no case sattel with this regards by court but it can be prove that this is not a stipend purpose, it is eversion of tax.
Is not "substance over legal form" the norm followed..... I mean u surely dont need Rs.450000 to study CA... on what basis is the comparison b/w 2,000 and 450,000 being made? Its prima facie not to meet the cost of education... So how can u say its exempt u/s 10(16)?