Ad Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your Mobile. Subscribe Now!

SITTING FEE

20 May 2009

Hello Friends,

Can anyone tell me whether TDS TO BE MADE from sitting fee to attend board meeting by directors.In which section it will be deducted 192 or 194J.

Reply
Follow
Share

3 Replies

Mayank kharbanda (Risk Advisory Services) (409 Points)
Replied 20 May 2009

SEC 192

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Ashish Modi (CA FINAL STUDENT) (80 Points)
Replied 20 May 2009

Decision of the Delhi High Court

The Delhi Tribunal in CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. [2001] 250 ITR 846/118 Taxman 449 held that sitting fees paid to the director for attending board meetings could not be said to be remuneration and it was in the nature of daily allowance. Reversing such decision, the Delhi High Court held that the fees, which were paid as directors’ fees, or board meetings fees were in respect of the services rendered by the directors in their capacity as directors and such fees would fall within the meaning of the word ‘remuneration’.

In the case of a non-working director often a question arises whether any payments made to them either as meeting/sitting fee including reimbursements, etc., are to be made subject to tax. The answer to such question will be in affirmative on the basis of the following scrutiny of the provisions of law.

Position under Income-tax Act

2. Section 194J requires deduction of tax at source with reference to any sum paid by way of fees for professional or technical services. In case such director is a professional under either of the specified categories under section 44AA, then the provisions of section 194J have straight application. On the other hand, if such director is not a professional as well as a non-technical person in ordinary parlance, then one has to refer to the position of such director as is understood in the normal phraseology under the Companies Act, 1956.

As per clause (13) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956, a director includes any person occupying the position of director, by whatever name called. Further, clause (24) to section 2 of the said Act refers to the term ‘manager’ ‘meaning an individual (not being the managing agency), who, subject to the superintendence, control and direction of the board of directors, has the management of the whole, or substantially the whole, of the affairs of a company, and includes a director or any other person occupying the position of a manager, by whatever name called, and whether under a contract of service or not. In other words, a non-working director with a contract of service would come under the definition of ‘managerial personnel’.

Clause (b) to Explanation in section 194J draws reference to the term ‘fees for professional or technical services’ to have the meaning assigned as per Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section

9. Such Explanation 2 reads as follows:

“Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this clause, ‘fees for technical services’ means any consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services (including the provision of services of technical or other personnel) but does not include consideration for any construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient or consideration which would be income of the recipient chargeable under the head ‘Salaries’.”

As a director is also a manager under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 he is, therefore, a technical personnel and any payment made to such director be it a sitting fee or any other sum shall be required to be taken into consideration for the purposes of deduction of tax at source under section 194J of the Income tax Act, 1961 at the rate of 10 per cent.

DHARMENDRA KAPOOR (CA) (183 Points)
Replied 21 May 2009

Originally posted by :Ashish Modi

Thanks Ashish for such a useful information.

Decision of the Delhi High Court

The Delhi Tribunal in CIT v. Orissa Cement Ltd. [2001] 250 ITR 846/118 Taxman 449 held that sitting fees paid to the director for attending board meetings could not be said to be remuneration and it was in the nature of daily allowance. Reversing such decision, the Delhi High Court held that the fees, which were paid as directors’ fees, or board meetings fees were in respect of the services rendered by the directors in their capacity as directors and such fees would fall within the meaning of the word ‘remuneration’.

In the case of a non-working director often a question arises whether any payments made to them either as meeting/sitting fee including reimbursements, etc., are to be made subject to tax. The answer to such question will be in affirmative on the basis of the following scrutiny of the provisions of law.

Position under Income-tax Act

2. Section 194J requires deduction of tax at source with reference to any sum paid by way of fees for professional or technical services. In case such director is a professional under either of the specified categories under section 44AA, then the provisions of section 194J have straight application. On the other hand, if such director is not a professional as well as a non-technical person in ordinary parlance, then one has to refer to the position of such director as is understood in the normal phraseology under the Companies Act, 1956.

As per clause (13) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 1956, a director includes any person occupying the position of director, by whatever name called. Further, clause (24) to section 2 of the said Act refers to the term ‘manager’ ‘meaning an individual (not being the managing agency), who, subject to the superintendence, control and direction of the board of directors, has the management of the whole, or substantially the whole, of the affairs of a company, and includes a director or any other person occupying the position of a manager, by whatever name called, and whether under a contract of service or not. In other words, a non-working director with a contract of service would come under the definition of ‘managerial personnel’.

Clause (b) to Explanation in section 194J draws reference to the term ‘fees for professional or technical services’ to have the meaning assigned as per Explanation 2 to clause (vii) of sub-section (1) of section

9. Such Explanation 2 reads as follows:
“Explanation 2.—For the purposes of this clause, ‘fees for technical services’ means any consideration (including any lump sum consideration) for the rendering of any managerial, technical or consultancy services (including the provision of services of technical or other personnel) but does not include consideration for any construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient or consideration which would be income of the recipient chargeable under the head ‘Salaries’.”

As a director is also a manager under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 he is, therefore, a technical personnel and any payment made to such director be it a sitting fee or any other sum shall be required to be taken into consideration for the purposes of deduction of tax at source under section 194J of the Income tax Act, 1961 at the rate of 10 per cent.