I just ask one question - why there is a system of revaluation introduced by the Institute?
Because, if the student is confident that he appeared well but the marks are not up to mark then he could get it revalued. When numbers are increased "honestly" by the Institute then what fault was there on the part of the Institute ?
The revaluation process of the Institute is such that the examiner who checked the copy for the first time is required to check it again when such request is made. It means that Institute believes on the examiners because they are highly qualified persons. They have to follow rules strictly.
So one can see the same examiner rectify his own mistake and increase the marks previously allotted by him.
I agree that these mistakes should not be continued. Even examiner don't wish that such cases should appear before him that he put himself into a position to recheck his own work.
The student should feel happy when he is declared pass by the Institute.