Originally posted by : Manoj Agarwal |
|
Originally posted by : CA AYUSH AGRAWAL
i totally agreed with manoj sir bcoz above calculation includes double taxation....
But That is What Our Law Says..........
Agreed...that's indeed the legal position. But it seems to be ultra vires our Constitution...if someone moves the court and challenges the same...
And regarding VAT on service charges of Rs. 100... is is correct?
|
|
No...I Dont Think so..
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. Vs. Union of India [(2006) 2-STR-161]
In this case Supreme Court held that value added tax (VAT) and service tax were mutually exclusive and would operate in their respective domains.
SC further held that transaction in its entirely could not be charged to both taxes and that consequently double taxation of a single transaction, comprising both services and transfer of property in goods, was impermissible. This principle is particularly relevant for under standing the treatment of works contract for the purpose of indirect taxes.
In Case of Work Contract
The High Court followed the decision of the Supreme Court in the BSNL case in coming to this conclusion that works contract will now be chargeable to both service tax and VAT, insofar as they are composite contracts with both material and labour elements being present. It is also equally clear that both these taxes can only be applied in their respective domains and cannot apply to the entirety of the contract. It is therefore incumbent on works contractors to ensure that they appropriately discharge their liabilities to the two taxes, as according to the options available under respective statutes.
So Same we Can Relate with Food Restaurent Service Too.