Section 54 benefit- multiple houses

Page no : 2

Naveen Kumar Jain (Chartered Accountant) (640 Points)
Replied 22 October 2017

Thank you, Sir


Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 23 October 2017

Most welcome.........


D Vinayak (DIRECTOR) (22 Points)
Replied 24 May 2018

Sirji, we have two appartments, both jointly owned (50% each) and invested by me and my wife. We sold a land which also was jointly owned. can we claim 54F as each share only 50% of two apartment and not full?


Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 24 May 2018

No. Because ownership is certainly defined in this case. Rather better option would be construct a small room, and sell it as 'house'.


Pradeep Goel (Chartered Accountant) (26 Points)
Replied 16 September 2018

What about if I sell 3 properties in one year on different dates but invest only in one property. I guess Section 54 benefit can be availed fully ? Please confirm.



Pradeep Goel (Chartered Accountant) (26 Points)
Replied 16 September 2018

Further, if I have multiple properties, can I sell one each year and invest also and keep getting section 54 benefit every year ?


Pradeep Goel (Chartered Accountant) (26 Points)
Replied 16 September 2018

Further, if I have multiple properties, can I sell one each year and invest also and keep getting section 54 benefit every year ?


Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 16 September 2018

Originally posted by : Pradeep Goel
What about if I sell 3 properties in one year on different dates but invest only in one property. I guess Section 54 benefit can be availed fully ? Please confirm.

 

Yes, upto the gain invested in the new residential property (as per sec. 54 of IT act.)


Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 16 September 2018

Originally posted by : Pradeep Goel
Further, if I have multiple properties, can I sell one each year and invest also and keep getting section 54 benefit every year ?

 

Yes, there is no question of SELL of multiple properties. (concept is called 'Roll Over')

1 Like

Dear Ramji1 (6 Points)
Replied 07 December 2018

Sir , one basic doubt. A tax payer Mr.A (is having consulting business) has 2 house properties ( residential flats). These 2 flats are in the ownership of Mr A & Mrs A ( house wife). Now Mr A gets a share of 20 Lacs from old family inheritance residential property. Doubt 1- if Mr A invests 20 L in new house property , is he eligible to claim 54 sec or is he not eligible as already has 2 houses, kindly clarify


Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 07 December 2018

@ Dear Ramji 1 ....

As per section 54, there is no restriction as to number of house property held by him.

I.e. he can avail exemption u/s. 54 by investment in third residential property. (but not u/s. 54F)


Dear Ramji1 (6 Points)
Replied 07 December 2018

Thanks Dhirajlal Sir for your valuable reply. One CA friend says the preamble to both sections 54 & 54F says the tax payer could have maximum 2 houses including the new 54 house. But I checked bare act. Bare act says this maximum 2 houses condition only for 54F, kindly clarify Sir ( may I have your Gmail Sir please)

Dhirajlal Rambhia (SEO Sai Gr. Hosp.) (178226 Points)
Replied 07 December 2018

Let me confirm that the property transfered/sold is a residential house, and not any other asset like land etc.

If yes, than section 54 applicable and not sec. 54F.

Section 54F has following conditions which are not specified under section 54::

 

Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall apply where—

(a) the assessee,—

(i) owns more than one residential house, other than the new asset, on the date of transfer of the original asset; or

(ii) purchases any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of one year after the date of transfer of the original asset; or

(iii) constructs any residential house, other than the new asset, within a period of three years after the date of transfer of the original asset; and


Dear Ramji1 (6 Points)
Replied 08 December 2018

Many thanks Sir



mtvcamba (Chartered Accountant) (112 Points)
Replied 22 December 2018

I feel that your logic sounds good and it matches the intention that the Govt would have had. If the provision has to be intrepreted so strictly, then there are some assesses who will suffer due to clubning provisions, 



Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Join CCI Pro


Subscribe to the latest topics :

Search Forum: