SECTION 44AD- DRAFTING BLUNDER OR INTENTION
CA Sudhir Halakhandi (PRACTICING CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT) (13401 Points)
13 July 2009CA Sudhir Halakhandi (PRACTICING CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT) (13401 Points)
13 July 2009
CA Nitin Wadhwani
(Chartered Accountant)
(4469 Points)
Replied 13 July 2009
Sir, in my opinion the word "AND" should be replaced by word "OR".
This was also discussed at the recent meeting held by WIRC on Budget - Tax Proposals whereby Tax Amendments proposed were discussed at length.
A Letter was also addressed to CBDT to get the proper information on such inconsistency to avoid any confusion.
SSG
(1936 Points)
Replied 13 July 2009
I agree with you Sir. Also there is no clarity about the year from which it will be applicable : -
1st April 2011 will mean previous year 2011-12 and Assessment Year 2012-13.
"The proposed amendment will take effect from 1st April, 2011 and will, accordingly, apply in relation to the assessment year
2011-12 and subsequent years."
CA Vinay Saraf
(CA)
(148 Points)
Replied 13 July 2009
THANKS FOR VALUABLE INTERPRETATIONS & INFORMATIONS TO ALL OF YOU.
SSG
(1936 Points)
Replied 14 July 2009
The assesses whose income is below the taxable limit are exempt from filing IT return. The intention of the Govt. must have been relating to these assesses -
these provisions, will, in case his total income exceeds the taxable limit, be required to maintain books of accounts
and also get them audited.
"
BALASUBRAMANYA B N
(CCI STUDENT....)
(44679 Points)
Replied 14 July 2009
nice information sir, thanks for sharing
kunalghelani
(Practicing Professional)
(27 Points)
Replied 14 July 2009
your analysis is perfectly correct. In my view, the government has decided to exempt small assessees from the tax net. However, if the amendment in Section 147 is read together with the amendment in 44AD, it appears that at any point of time these assessees can be brought under investigation network of the taxmen. This can be made possible through the network of PAN, by making the Scrutiny of TDS returns compulsary and also through AIR.
Anumanchipalli Sathikonda
(Tax Consultant)
(1559 Points)
Replied 14 July 2009
Mr.Born To Rule
As per the Explanation to proposed section 44AD
the following are the eligible assessees
(1) Resident Individual
(2) Resident HUF
and
(3) Resident Partnership Firm but not an LLP
and the above assessees should not have claimed the deductions u/s 10A, 10AA, 10B, 10BA or deductions under chapter VIA in the relevant assessment year.
an eligible business is-
any business except the business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages referred to in section 44AE and whose total turnover or gross receipts in the previous year does not exceed an amount of forty lakh rupees.
Best Wishes
Sathikonda
Ritesh
(CA Final)
(326 Points)
Replied 14 July 2009
Sir, that was a great analysis...........Thanks for sharing.
But as pointed by Nitin, even if the intention was to use 'or' instead of 'and', i have a query.
Presuming that the intention was to use 'or' instead of 'and', Is there any consequential amendment in Sec. 44AB due to amendment in Sec. 44AD ? otherwise new Sec. 44AD looks contrary to Sec. 44AB......Since Sec 44AB talks about minimum turnover of 40 Lacs to get accounts audited, whereas reading of new Sec. 44AD suggest that there could be a situation where an assessee even having turnover less than Rs. 40 Lacs would have to gets his Accounts audited......This all i am saying presuming the word 'or' instead of 'and'...
There must be some amendment in Sec. 44AB, which i am yet to find.....If someone is aware of it, please let me know?