Ad-Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your mobile. Subscribe Now!

Section 35D of Income Tax Act

13 October 2007

Hi Friends,

please clarify me whether the term "capital employed" used in section 35D of IT Act means issued capital or paid up capital.......... in act it says issued capital......... but why is it so?........ since in real sense what we have employed in the company is only paid up capital

it would be of great help if one could specify any case law in this regard

Gaurav Gupta

Reply
Follow
Share

3 Replies

Late CA Sampat Jain (Chartered Accountant) (4772 Points)
Replied 13 October 2007

when a specific definition is given in the section the same is to be followed .

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Gauravgupta (63 Points)
Replied 13 October 2007

That I understand sir but then is securities premium a part of issued capital???....refer schedule VI where securities premium is shown under reserve & surplus head.... it has been held in the case of CIT vs Sirhind steel Ltd. (2005) 97 ITD 502 (Ahd) that " issued share capital includes share/securities premium account also"....the case is specially refered in taxmann books.... strictly following the words of the act it should not have been included

satish (x) (21 Points)
Replied 20 June 2011

IT LOOKS LIKE DEAR GAURAV V GUPTA HAS NOT READ JUDGEMENT CAREFULLY WHICH QUOTED AS FOLLOWS

Section 35D of Income-tax Act – Premium collected by assessee on issue of its share capital has to be excluded for purpose of determining amount of capital employed in business of company while computing deduction under section 35D(3)

The disallowance of claim under section 35D made by the AO by excluding the share premium from the capital employed in the business of the company is justified

for more information follow the link

https://www.taxmann.com/opencaselaws.aspx?stype=2&searchid=3517&tp=digest

[2010] 6 taxmann.com 101 (New Delhi - ITAT)

ITAT DELHI BENCH ‘A’: NEW DELHI

DCIT

Axis & T. Ltd.

I.T.A. Nos. 211 & 823/Del/2010

July 29, 2010