Its on overall basis i.e. for the whole firm including any no of partners.
Chintan Vasa
(CA Final Student M.Com)
(1241 Points)
Replied 30 November 2010
Its on overall basis i.e. for the whole firm including any no of partners.
Barun Kumar Ghosh
(Chartered Accountant)
(194 Points)
Replied 30 November 2010
Section 40(b) is applicable to limited liabilty partnership also.
CA P KARTHIKA
(Chartered Accountant)
(715 Points)
Replied 30 November 2010
Hi Mr. Vinay,,,,
Even though there are 2 partners deductions is available as computed with in the least of 1. actual remuneration paid or 2. {higher of 90% on First Rs. 300000/- net profit or Rs. 150000; plus 60% on balance irrespective of number of partners.... provided the above computed remuneration will remain deductible whereas excess paid above it will be disallowed....
Regards,
P. Karthika
Vinay Raja
(student-IPCC)
(704 Points)
Replied 30 November 2010
thaks for the concern karthika ji
but i think the the first limit is not actual remuneration recieved but the maximum remuneration allowed by the partnership deed
can you plese counter check on this
praveen
(Practicing CA)
(22 Points)
Replied 30 November 2010
Originally posted by : Vinay Raja | ||
![]() |
section 40(b) of income tax provides that the exemption is for first 3,00,000 or loss - 1,50,000 or 90%of BP whichever is higher for the balace - 60%of BP my question is what if there are two working partnes?? will the deduction be available for both i.e., two times or will it bw done on pari passu basis?? |
![]() |
This is max. allowable remuneration to partners. Salary is payable only to working partners. This amount can be shared by the partners equally or as decided by the partners between them.
Aditya Deo
(CWA)
(27 Points)
Replied 01 December 2010
@ Vinay
The tax law clearly states "Amount of such payment to all the partners during the previous year exceeds the aggregate amount computed"
it means, if there are more than two partners, amount of payment to all those partners combined to be considered. now, question is ratio.. i guess, what R. Suresh Shrinivasan has said is correct: "salary ratio to be considered rather than profit sharing ratio."
Vinay Raja
(student-IPCC)
(704 Points)
Replied 02 December 2010
Originally posted by : Barun Kumar Ghosh | ||
![]() |
Section 40(b) is applicable to limited liabilty partnership also. |
![]() |
barun ji
Prateek
(B.Com(H) PGDBA CA Final)
(436 Points)
Replied 28 April 2012
is it necessary to pay remuneration to partner...Like ABC has two partner A's wife and son..A joined as manager taking salary instead of Remuneration. Is there any issues in this ??
Dintakurthi Tirumala
(CA FINAL)
(15994 Points)
Replied 29 April 2012
Mr. Parteep in you case Mr.A doesn't partner of the firm so remunaration liability doesn't arises. And Mr.A joined as employee of the firm so salay payment arises.
OM SAI SRI SAI JAI JAI SAI
Anumanchipalli Sathikonda
(Tax Consultant)
(1559 Points)
Replied 29 April 2012
Dear All
Mr.Prateek's question is if any salary paid(by the partnership firm) to Mr.A who is a manager of a firm, in which partnership firm, his (mr.A's) son and spouse are partners-any restrictive provisions are applicable to the payment of the salary to Mr.A, by the firm?
Yes. Mr.Prateek the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) will come to operation.
Best Wishes
Sathikonda