An employee take dwelling house for his own use .He paid rent Rs.20000/- PM.
Same rent reimbursed by corporate body company separately, other than regular salary.
As per sec.2(93 ) of CGST Act company acting as an principal agent and it is construed that supply is made to company.
Hence rent paid by employee to landlord , which is reimbursed by co.is liable to pay RCM GST.
Here there is no any contractual agreement between employee and employer for rent.
Is my information is correct
Menu
Sec.2 (93 ) of CGST Act
Replies (3)
But sir , rent paid is debited to rent exp.there is no contractual agreement between employee and employer for rent. Company pay rent to employee indirectly company is recipient and sec.2 (93) says that company is acting as an agent.
In my understanding, it has to be debited to Employee Cost not to Rent paid.
What are the view's of other expert
Recent Topic
- Delayed reported invoice in GSTR1
- Kusumgar IPO Listing Date: Shares Debut on BSE, NS
- When is Diwali in 2026? Date, Muhurat Timing and D
- Amount received by son from PPF closure proceeds o
- Clarification on Nature of Payment Code for NRI Pr
- Fee received as Independent Director
- Correct way to show income from annuity in ITR
- ITR 3 issues
- What after death of proprietor
- TDS paid under old regime instead of new
Related Topics
CAclubindia
