Sebi fines ca for failing to respond to summons

 

 

Market regulator Sebi today imposed a penalty of Rs 6 lakh on Dilip S Mehta, owner of achartered accountancy firm, for failing to respond to summons issued by it in relation to a probe into the affairs of erstwhile Bank ofRajasthan. The matter pertains to alleged irregularities committed by former promoters ofBank of Rajasthan (BoR).

Imposing a “penalty of Rs 6 lakh”, Sebi in itsorder today said Mehta’s failure indicates that the default is repetitive in nature.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) had summoned Mehta to examine his link to Sangeeta Jayram Sawant, director of 30 companies that were connected to the promoters which were buying and selling shares of BoR.

It had issued two summons to Mehta. Both were received by him but did not comply with them.

The market regulator observed that the information sought from Mehta was critical and imperative to the investigation and failure on his part to comply with the summons had hampered the probe.

Sebi noted that the “information provided by the notice now is of no relevance and cannot be accepted as the same was required by the Investigating Authority before the completion of the investigation. Hence the submissions made by the noticee re not accepted”.

The matter relates to Sebi’s investigation into the affairs of BoR for a period between June 2007 and December 2009. Since then, BoR has been acquired by ICICI Bank.

The probe revealed that BoR’s then promoters, led by Pravin Kumar Tayal, along with some companies that were connected to him and his relatives, by way of their continuous disclosure publicly announced that their stake had come down from 44.2 per cent as on quarter ending June 2007 to 28.6 per cent as on quarter ending December 2009.

However, it was alleged, though as per disclosure their holding seemed to have reduced, but in reality the holding of the promoters actually increased with the active collusion of front entities.

Thus, the shareholding of the promoters of BoR with PACs (Person Acting in Concert) had increased from 46.8 per cent in June 2007 to 63.15 per cent in December 2009.

Replies (1)
I think he (or any other guilty CAs) should be given jail term under IPC

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  

Company
10 November 2026
Direct Tax Manager

CAAQ CONSULTANCY PVT LTD

New Delhi

CA Final

View Details
Company
12 November 2026
Auditor

Oz Taxation

Vijayawada

Graduate (Any)

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
Accountant

Rize.farm

Bengaluru

B.Com

View Details
Company
23 October 2026
Sr. Accountant

SANKARAN & KRISHNAN

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
21 October 2026
CA INTER/ BCOM WITH EXPERIENCE

CA S KUMAR GUPTA & CO

Amritsar

CA Inter

View Details
Company
30 October 2026
Asst Manager Accounts

Goodwin Pumps India Pvt Ltd

Chengalpattu

CA Inter

View Details
Company
14 October 2026
GST & TDS ASSISTANT

AGGARWAL SANJAY & ASSOCIATES

New Delhi

B.Com

View Details
Company
Featured 27 October 2026
semi-qualified CA

Saini Pati Shah & Co LLP, Chartered Accountants

Mumbai

CA Final

View Details