chartered accountant & taking coaching c
40 Points
Joined May 2010
i AM AGREE WITH MR. RAVINDRAG. IN ONE OF THE MATTER I SELECT ROOT OFSECTION 154. SO FIRST DECIDE THE CAUSE THAN TAKE APPROPRIATE STEP.
Return u/s. 139(5) can be revised before completion of assessment or within 1 year from the end of the respective assessment year whichever is earlier. Intimation u/s. 143(1) is not deemed to be completion of assessment and hence return can be revised even after receipt of intimation u/s. 143(1). Return can be revised for any omission or wrong statement in the original return filed.
Application for Rectification of mistake u/s.154 is made for rectifying mistakes apparent from the record and mistake should not be such which require detailed scrutiny of the records. It must be patent and clearly apparent. Moreover this application can be made for mistakes made by assessee as well as by department.
In this case as profit as per P & L A/c was mistakenly shown to be 11 Lac. I presume, it can be either arithmetic error or some expenditure might not have been disclosed. If it is arithmetic error, 154 may be proceeded but this doesn't seem to be the case. Hence in other situation (ie expenditure not disclosed/shown fully), it can't be termed as mistake apparent from the record (but omission - one of the criteria for revised return).
Hence in this situation better alternative seems to file revised return. However, according to me, first of all it would be better to find out root cause of this mistake and then act accordingly.