A Company is availing services of GTA. The GTA sends its bill charging service tax on 100% of the amount. The Company is not recognising its liability under reverse charge mechanism for availing GTA services. There is no specific contract between GTA and the Co. Is this the right practice?
Eg. Bill amount=10000
ST @ 12.36%=1236
Total bill amount 11236 send by GTA to Company
According to me, in case of a GTA, liability to pay ST is not of the provider in any case. It is either 25% if the provider gives a certificate or specifies on his bill that he is not availing cenvat credit, or it is 100% is no such declaration is made. In both cases, receiver is liable to pay ST. However, the company is not recognising its liability under RCL saying there is no revenue loss to the government. If this is right, why was RCL brought?
Reverse charge query
Faraz (Student) (236 Points)
29 January 2014