Knowledge Seeker
3711 Points
Joined June 2009
As per Section 255, 2/3rd of the total number of directors of a public company shall be liable to retire by rotation.
Thus, in your case, out of total 6 directors atleast 4 directors should retire by rotation. Hence, this section is being complied with as there are 5 rotational directors.
Secondly, As per section 256, 1/3rd of the rotational directors determined under section 255 shall retire by rotation. The directors to retire by rotation at every AGM shall be those who have been longest in office since their appointment. If 2 or more persons became directors on the same day, then subject to any agreement among themselves, the retiring director shall be otherwise determined by lot.
In your case, out of the 5 rotational directors, 1/3rd of it shall retire by rotation ie 1.67 rounded to 2.
Thus, the 2 directors need to be determined either by person holding longest in office or by lot.