Ad-Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your mobile. Subscribe Now!

Query about mvat/cst registration

02 February 2017

In the month of August 2016, we have started a partnership firm at Pune. Still, our firm is in prototype development stage so our sale & turnover is zero. But in last month, 20th Jan 2017, we have purchased raw material from interstate (Gujarat) which costs 10,000 INR. For my above-explained case, do I need to register for MVAT/CST ?

Reply
Follow
Share

9 Replies

manoj (student) (5205 Points)
Replied 02 February 2017

if you want to claim this tax in set off

then you have to register

1 Like

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

AMOL RAYKAR (128 Points)
Replied 02 February 2017

thank you Manoj Sir,
do we have to take mandatory registration or voluntary registration?

manoj (student) (5205 Points)
Replied 02 February 2017

Go for voluntary

AMOL RAYKAR (128 Points)
Replied 02 February 2017

dear Manoj Sir,
can you please share the threshold limit for CST/MVAT mandatory registration for interstate transaction

manoj (student) (5205 Points)
Replied 03 February 2017

for local i.e. in maharashtra limit is 10 Lacs

for cst no limit i.e. zero

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

manoj (student) (5205 Points)
Replied 03 February 2017

for local i.e. in maharashtra limit is 10 Lacs

for cst no limit i.e. zero

AMOL RAYKAR (128 Points)
Replied 03 February 2017

if we are purchasing a material from interstate , do we have to do registration for CST???

manoj (student) (5205 Points)
Replied 04 February 2017

Ya I also suggest you for smooth transmission to GST you should refister both for CST AND MVAT

1 Like

AMOL RAYKAR (128 Points)
Replied 06 February 2017

dear manoj sir,

i am littile bit confused,

https://www.indiafilings.com/learn/vat-cst-registration-in-india/

please go through this link.

in this link page,for VAT registration they have written as "when a person or entity brings goods from outside the state for sale VAT registration is mandatory

can you please justify this statement with your previous reply