Place of supply

281 views 13 replies
a person Mr X (registerd in Kerala) sold a pre installed tower located in Delhi to Mr Y (registered in Madhya Pradesh).

1)what will be the POS?
Replies (13)
Madhya Pradesh
Hi, POS of immovable property will be the location of immovable property is situated. Hence here it will be Delhi.
POS DELHI
Place of installation I. e. madhya pradesh. pls refer 10(1) (d) of igst act. pos will be immovable property is in case of supply of services. here it's case of supply of goods.
Here it is pre installed tower located in Delhi...so Place of installation is at Delhi.. So POS is in delhi
Thanx for replying..

but pls tell me that will it qualify as "goods"

@ david. I assumed that tower will be sold to person in MP and 'pre-installed''' is its characteristics and thought that tower will be supplied and installed at MP.  If Its going to be installed at Delhi, then POS will be delhi. Apology for gap in understanding.  

 

@ sushil, if its merely installation services then its supply of services. If its involves supply of tower as well its installation then it qualifies as composite supply and principal supply is supply of tower which is goods

@ hemal sir..

in question it is said that the pre installed tower is sold to mr y..

so it's a sale and not service as per opinion sir..

and if it's sale then it's good..but as per goods definition an immovable property is not goods..so question is if it's not good then it is not supply and there will be no question of POS..
@ sushil Sir



The towers are merely fastened to the civil foundation to make them wobble- free and ensure stability. Further, such towers can be unbolted and reassembled without any damage in a new location. Accordingly, the towers cannot be considered as permanently attached to the earth, and consequently, its not immovable property.

There are judicial precedents whereby it has been held that tower are not immovable properties and cenvat credit can be allowed.
Sir if possible can u give some judicial precedents for reference
Vodafone mobile services Ltd vs commissioner of service tax 2018 delhi high Court - in favour of assessed

bharti airtel vs cce, pune - bombay high court -in favour of revenue.

pending at supreme court level .

telecommunication towers are excluded from the definition of plant and machinery under gst.
however, that's when delhi high Court judgement provides ray of hope to taxpayers..

in my view it should be allowed by supreme Court.
Ok..thank u so much sir
Pos is Delhi as per igst act section 10 (1) d


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register