PCC Nov 2011

AS 2396 views 37 replies
Yaar do we need toconsider retrospective effect in this question?
Its 9l wdv. Then rev 3l amts to 12 less salvage 3l . 9l for ten years
No not retrospective effect , its prospective , ref AS
Yaar u hav already reduced 2lac as salvage value n nw again u are deductin 3 lac ...it wale make total of 5 lac
Originally posted by : radhika agarwal

i got dep as 90,000/- from 4th year..........

Yup i got the same 

i got 90,000..hw cum 70,000?

Yes i guess 90000 is the right answer.

90000 dep for 4 th year sales ratio 1:3 time ratio 1:2
90000 is the right answer
Sales ratio is 4:14

Dear all,

 

please do not worry so much abt exam that is over. Forget accounts and concentrate on other paper. After exams, you may have a discussion.

 

its 90000.....fr fourth year

Working for dep is as below:

For 1st 3 years on SLM basis: (O. Cost- Resi Value @ end)/total useful life

= (12,00,000-2,00,000)/10 = 1,00,000 for each year..

so wdv at end of 3rd year= 9,00,000  (12,00,000-3,00,000)..

After Revaluation WDV of asset= 9,00,000+3,00,000=12,00,000

Also Revaluation of Residual Valu= 2,00,000+1,00,000= 3,00,000

Also remaining useful life was reassessed to 10 years.

So from 4th year using the above formula again Dep will be

=(12,00,000-3,00,000)/10 = 90,000...

As per AS 6 when there is no change in method of application of Dep it shall not be charged back on retrospective basis!!!

I agree with jayesh A Samudra dep was Rs 90000/-

and Sales Ratio is 6:14

Best of luck

Sales Ratio was 2:7 (or 4:14)


CCI Pro

Leave a Reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register