What is the difference b/w Garner Vs Muraay Rule and Accounting acc. to the Indian Practice ? Plz reply in details.
2 Replies
pRaSoOn
(Articled assistant)
(500 Points)
Replied 12 March 2008
Hi anurag.....first of all, there is nothing like accounting in case of insolvency. When the verdict on Garner Vs. Murray case was announced by esteemed court in England, whole world including India accepted it as it is.....that was because as a matter of fact, it has been proved that understanding of accounting concepts of British Judges was far better then even top accountants of that time so it was the best decision that could be....thats why the case and its rules has been adopted in India ditto.....as far as change is concerned, I think the only change was...hmmm currency...rs. in case of india...
pRaSoOn
(Articled assistant)
(500 Points)
Replied 12 March 2008
And remember its MURRAY not MURAAY....
Recent Topics
- Gratuity under CTC
- GST refund paid as estimated tax liability
- Salary Income and Professional services income
- Sec 54 and TDS on sale of property
- Airbnb Manager - I manage properties for owners
- Wrong head ed for late fee
- Inter Company trnafer
- Job work-Reg
- Who is liable to pay GST if bank charges excl GST
- Cost of Acquisition IPO cases
Related Threads
Trending Online Classes
-
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
Mr.Balamurugan Ranganathan15 November 2024
CAclubindia
