Ad Free CAclubindia and Daily Updates on your Mobile. Subscribe Now!

Notice under section 143 ( 1 )

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)

28 November 2019

I received notice under section 143 (1) for A.Y. 2010-11...I submitted its response but still site shows demand pending..why??

Reply
Follow
Share

16 Replies

rama krishnan (12239 Points)
Replied 28 November 2019

For a. y. 2010-11? could you please elucidate the contents of the notice?

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

Kapadia Pravin (17259 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Chaitri
That must be a statement of outstanding demand as appearing on CPC record .

I presume, this you must have found in 143(1) intimation for AY 2019-2020. (as a supplementary page)

Old demands if you do not agree than visit AO's office, give explanation alongwith supporting documents. on that basis AO if satisfied, will remove the demand .

if anything else, let know.

1 Like

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

@ rama krishnan sir..actually I received notice for outstanding demand for a.y. 2010-11 in last year nd I responded it but still it is shown on site...

@ pravin sir.....actually every process has already been done as you are saying but still outstanding demand notice has not been removed...

rama krishnan (12239 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Outstanding demand for a. y. 2010-11 might be due to mismatch in TDS or disallowance of relief claimed under section 89. generally, demands won't be nullified just on receipt of your response. it needs to be verified. hence generate 143(1) intimation sheet and compare the same with the ITR filed by you and ascertain the reason for the demand. after that file rectification application either directly before your jurisdictional AO or through e-nivaran along with requisite documents. once, jurisdictional AO passes rectification order under section 154,then your outstanding demand will be nullified, as the case may be

1 Like

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Ok sir...yes demand was due to mismatch in tds....ok then I will go for rectification...thank you so much

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

RAMAKRISHNAN R (INCOME TAX OFFICER) (1736 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Pleasure is mine.. You are always welcome

1 Like

Kapadia Pravin (17259 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Chaitri, eNivaran may not help. As I suggested you visit AO's office and meet the concerned person for vacating the demand and hand over a letter putting in reasons to justify. Also submit 26AS copy. If it's not moving ahead then contact AO directly and it's worth.

It will be done on the spot . AO's action will be reflected in CPC server and o/s demand disappears. This I did it for 4 clients.

Wishing best ....

1 Like

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Ok sir...thanks a lot...let me visit the office directly...

sabyasachi mukherjee (27574 Points)
Replied 29 November 2019

Chaitri
I can give u a very good solution.
pls chk whether 26AS .
AMOUNT PAID AND AMOUNT CLAIMED IS MATCHING OR NOT.

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 30 November 2019

No...it's not matched

Upgrade to CAclubindia Pro. Subscribe Now!

CA Arun Tiwari (Partner) (5955 Points)
Replied 05 December 2019

The taxpayer has to ascertain or recheck the ITR and 143(1) notice simultaneously that need to be ponder because it may be the case where deficiency may be arised due to omission or other facts as the case may be .

1 Like

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 05 December 2019

It was the case of mismatch of PAN....but now everything is settled....thank you so much for your reply....

Kapadia Pravin (17259 Points)
Replied 05 December 2019

Mis-match of PAN
where in ITR ? That's from assessee side.

1 Like

CHAITRI SUDHAKARBHAI KHAROD (ARTICLE) (752 Points)
Replied 05 December 2019

@ pravin sir....yes that's from assessee side and assessee is my father.....In a.y. 2010-11, one of the employees had entered wrong PAN by mistake in my father's office who is salarised person...due to mismatch of PAN, Tds demand raised even if fully paid by my father... but intimation received in this year but now everything is settled...