In case of oeder cheques ie... the account holder writes the name of the person as PAY XXXXX and he signs in front side of the cheque. In the reverse side the XXXXX signs and get the cash. The account holder is not signing at the back side of the cheque. Is this valid as per NI act.
4 Replies
Ravi Singh
(Article Assistant)
(100 Points)
Replied 05 January 2010
wud u lyk to clerify dis que a little more????
anand/ rana
(treasurer)
(30 Points)
Replied 06 January 2010
technically and legally there is no issue and banker cant deny the holder in due course the realisation of the amount. no where in NIA it has been written that it shall be signed at the back of the Cheque.
ashish gupta
( student)
(1922 Points)
Replied 08 January 2010
this is possible if cheque is a bearer cheque, otherwise when cheque is payable to order only then account holder has to sign on the back of the cheque also
(Guest)
If a cheque paid as bearer cheque the person holding the cheque can get the payment. Signing on the back side of cheque is a procedure of bank which is taken as receipt of money.
If a cheque issued as TO order then the bank has liable to pay only that person whose name is written on the instrument.
If a cheque is issued as Self then signature of account holder required on back side of cheque and if the withdrawaer is different from the account holder authorisation is also required.
Recent Topics
- Ewaybill generation for Return of Goods From Exhib
- A foreign entity engages some persons for doing th
- Property late registration selling now
- REQUIRED DELHI BASED LOGISTICS COMPANY 2 YRS OLD
- Rebate under 87A - STCG right to property
- GST RFD-01
- Profit & Loss Statement Analysis: Gross Profit
- Response to defective return notice in case of 139
- Capital loss for surcharge purchase?
- RCM on certain expenses under Sec.9(3) and 9(4)
Related Threads
CAclubindia
