kckinn
(CA)
(759 Points)
Replied 05 August 2010
1. Accounts : I did not draw any lines in the exam using pencil or scale in the solutions as time is usally a big factor specially for me. Neither did I write particulars and Rs in the format. Still I got good marks.
2. Law : I didn't remember most of the sections or case laws. But I had good concept clarity. So could answer all the analytical or application oriented questions to my satisfaction. Also had read Ethics, Communication part from Munish Bhandari. Didn't try to mug up Ethics and Communication part but tried to remember the headings in all parts and made the contents myself. It's easy if you read several times.
kckinn
(CA)
(759 Points)
Replied 05 August 2010
3. Costing and FM : This paper gave me jitters in the examination hall. I thought this paper would lead to my downfall. But fate had otherwise. I had attempted 72 marks only but mangaed 58. It might sound cliche but quality answer do fetch the mark. I was down after this paper and was sure that I wouldnt be clearing.
4. Taxation : Had prepapred well for this paper. This was my strongest subject. But marks reflect otherwise. I feel it had something to do with my performace with Costing and FM carrying on to this. I was so down after costing and FM that even in the examination hall I couldn't write Taxation with dedication. I felt like to heck with it. But luckily :) MY advice try not to carry disappointment of one paper to another, you might end up paying heavily for that.
Kalpesh Chauhan,
(Tax Assistant (Accounting Technician CA FINAL CS PROF. PROG. B.Com))
(8311 Points)
Replied 07 August 2010