Who can appoint the MD for a Limited Co.- The Board or the Shareholders?
can anybody give me a draft appointment letter
thanks
ravishankar
Ravishankar (C.A) (454 Points)
03 May 2008Who can appoint the MD for a Limited Co.- The Board or the Shareholders?
can anybody give me a draft appointment letter
thanks
ravishankar
Manish Soni
(CA , CS)
(828 Points)
Replied 05 May 2008
(1) On and from the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, every public company, or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, having a paid-up share capital of such sum as may be prescribed,
(2) On and from the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, no appointment of a person as a managing or whole-time director or a manager in a public company or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company shall be made except with the approval
(3) Every application seeking approval to the appointment of a managing or whole-time director or a manager shall be made to the Central Government within a period of ninety days from the date of such appointment.
(4) The Central Government shall not accord its approval to an application made under sub-section (3), if it is satisfied that-
(a) the managing or whole-time director or the manager appointed is, in its opinion, not a fit and proper person to be appointed as such or such appointment is not in the public interest; or
(b) the terms and conditions of the appointment of managing or whole-time director or the manager are not fair and reasonable.
(5) It shall be competent for the Central Government while according approval to an appointment under sub-section (3) to accord approval for a period lesser than the period for which the appointment is proposed to be made.
(6) If the appointment of a person as a managing or whole-time director or a manager is not approved by the Central Government under sub-section (4), the person so appointed shall vacate his office as such managing or whole-time director or manager on the date on which the decision of the Central Government is communicated to the company, and if he omits or fails to do so, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to
(7) Where the Central Government suo motu or on any information received by it is, prima facie, of the opinion that any appointment made under sub-section (2) without the approval of the Central Government has been made in contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII, it shall be competent for the Central Government to refer the matter to the
(8) The
(9) The
(10) On the making of an order by the
(a) the company shall be liable to a fine which may extend to
(b) every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a fine of
(c) the appointment of the managing or whole-time director or manager, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have come to an end and the person so appointed shall, in addition to being liable to pay a fine of
(11) If a company contravenes the provisions of sub-section (10) or any direction given by the
(12) All acts done by a managing or whole-time director or a manager, as the case may be, purporting to act in such capacity and whose appointment has been found to be in contravention of Schedule XIII, shall, if the acts so done are valid otherwise, be valid notwithstanding any order made by the
Explanation
.-In this section "appointment" includes re-appointment and "whole-time director" includes a director in the whole-time employment of the company.]#02 shall have a managing or whole-time director or a manager.#03 of the Central Government unless such appointment is made in accordance with the conditions specified in Parts I and II of Schedule XIII (the said Parts being subject to the provisions of Part III of that Schedule) and a return in the prescribed form#04 is filed within ninety days from the date of such appointment.#05[five thousand rupees] for every day during which he omits or fails to vacate such office.#06[Tribunal] for decision.#06[Tribunal] shall, on receipt of a reference under sub-section (7), issue a notice to the company, the managing or whole-time director or the manager, as the case may be, and the director or other officer responsible for complying with the requirements of Schedule XIII, to show cause as to why such appointment shall not be terminated and the penalties provided under sub-section (10) shall not be imposed.#06[Tribunal] shall, if, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the company, the managing or whole-time director or the manager, or the officer who is in default, as the case may be comes to the conclusion that the appointment has been made in contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII, make an order declaring that a contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII has taken place.#06[Tribunal] under sub-section (9),-#07[fifty thousand rupees];#08[one lakh rupees]; and#08[one lakh rupees], refund to the company the entire amount of salaries, commissions and perquisites received or enjoyed by him between the date of his appointment and the passing of such order.#06[Tribunal] under that sub-section, every officer of the company who is in default and the managing or whole-time director or the manager, as the case may be, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to a fine which may extend to #09[five hundred rupees] for every day of default.#06[Tribunal] under sub-section (9).
Manish Soni
(CA , CS)
(828 Points)
Replied 05 May 2008
(1) On and from the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, every public company, or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company, having a paid-up share capital of such sum as may be prescribed,
(2) On and from the commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1988, no appointment of a person as a managing or whole-time director or a manager in a public company or a private company which is a subsidiary of a public company shall be made except with the approval
(3) Every application seeking approval to the appointment of a managing or whole-time director or a manager shall be made to the Central Government within a period of ninety days from the date of such appointment.
(4) The Central Government shall not accord its approval to an application made under sub-section (3), if it is satisfied that-
(a) the managing or whole-time director or the manager appointed is, in its opinion, not a fit and proper person to be appointed as such or such appointment is not in the public interest; or
(b) the terms and conditions of the appointment of managing or whole-time director or the manager are not fair and reasonable.
(5) It shall be competent for the Central Government while according approval to an appointment under sub-section (3) to accord approval for a period lesser than the period for which the appointment is proposed to be made.
(6) If the appointment of a person as a managing or whole-time director or a manager is not approved by the Central Government under sub-section (4), the person so appointed shall vacate his office as such managing or whole-time director or manager on the date on which the decision of the Central Government is communicated to the company, and if he omits or fails to do so, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to
(7) Where the Central Government suo motu or on any information received by it is, prima facie, of the opinion that any appointment made under sub-section (2) without the approval of the Central Government has been made in contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII, it shall be competent for the Central Government to refer the matter to the
(8) The
(9) The
(10) On the making of an order by the
(a) the company shall be liable to a fine which may extend to
(b) every officer of the company who is in default shall be liable to a fine of
(c) the appointment of the managing or whole-time director or manager, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have come to an end and the person so appointed shall, in addition to being liable to pay a fine of
(11) If a company contravenes the provisions of sub-section (10) or any direction given by the
(12) All acts done by a managing or whole-time director or a manager, as the case may be, purporting to act in such capacity and whose appointment has been found to be in contravention of Schedule XIII, shall, if the acts so done are valid otherwise, be valid notwithstanding any order made by the
Explanation
.-In this section "appointment" includes re-appointment and "whole-time director" includes a director in the whole-time employment of the company.]#02 shall have a managing or whole-time director or a manager.#03 of the Central Government unless such appointment is made in accordance with the conditions specified in Parts I and II of Schedule XIII (the said Parts being subject to the provisions of Part III of that Schedule) and a return in the prescribed form#04 is filed within ninety days from the date of such appointment.#05[five thousand rupees] for every day during which he omits or fails to vacate such office.#06[Tribunal] for decision.#06[Tribunal] shall, on receipt of a reference under sub-section (7), issue a notice to the company, the managing or whole-time director or the manager, as the case may be, and the director or other officer responsible for complying with the requirements of Schedule XIII, to show cause as to why such appointment shall not be terminated and the penalties provided under sub-section (10) shall not be imposed.#06[Tribunal] shall, if, after giving a reasonable opportunity to the company, the managing or whole-time director or the manager, or the officer who is in default, as the case may be comes to the conclusion that the appointment has been made in contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII, make an order declaring that a contravention of the requirements of Schedule XIII has taken place.#06[Tribunal] under sub-section (9),-#07[fifty thousand rupees];#08[one lakh rupees]; and#08[one lakh rupees], refund to the company the entire amount of salaries, commissions and perquisites received or enjoyed by him between the date of his appointment and the passing of such order.#06[Tribunal] under that sub-section, every officer of the company who is in default and the managing or whole-time director or the manager, as the case may be, shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years and shall also be liable to a fine which may extend to #09[five hundred rupees] for every day of default.#06[Tribunal] under sub-section (9).
Landmark Judgments: Important Provisions of the EPF & ESI Act interpreted by the Honorable Supreme Court of India
CAclubindia
