could ny1 explain me the statement "though wagering contract is void, transactions coincidental to wagering transactions are not void"
Menu
Law
Replies (1)
wagering agreement
A and B bet as to whether it would rain on a particular day or not A promising to pay Rs. 100 to B if it rained, and B promising an equal amount to A, if it did not. This agreement is wager.
matter coincidental to wagering contract
A borrows Rs. 500 from B to pay to C, to whom B has lost a bet. Contract between A and B is valid.contract between B & C is wagering contract & hence void.But contract between A & B is matter coincidental to awgering contract hence valid
hope u understand
Recent Topics :
- Who will take FSSAI AND TRADE LICENSE: owner or te
- E Way Bill in respect of Without Bringing Material
- FAST DS 2026 query
- Consultation
- E-way notices for FY 22-23
- Gst file not created
- Regarding 3CEB query
- Omitted E-Commerce Sales Reported in Table 14 but
- Omitted sales shown in GSTR-1 Table 14 but not in
- EWAY BILL TAKE OUT OF OTHER COMPAMY
Related Topics :
CAclubindia
