could ny1 explain me the statement "though wagering contract is void, transactions coincidental to wagering transactions are not void"
Menu
Law
Replies (1)
wagering agreement
A and B bet as to whether it would rain on a particular day or not A promising to pay Rs. 100 to B if it rained, and B promising an equal amount to A, if it did not. This agreement is wager.
matter coincidental to wagering contract
A borrows Rs. 500 from B to pay to C, to whom B has lost a bet. Contract between A and B is valid.contract between B & C is wagering contract & hence void.But contract between A & B is matter coincidental to awgering contract hence valid
hope u understand
Recent Threads
- Presumptive tax 44ADA
- Performances of actors and singers
- Discount Received Income in GSTR  - 9
- Whether afer responding to query amount of expen
- Sample of board meetings of a private limited comp
- Filed IT return under old scheme , can he file rev
- Reconciling Zoho Books with Tally
- Freelance Accounting Services - Work From Home
- Spom exam doubt
- GST RCM on contractual consultant who works as lik
Related Threads
CAclubindia
