Service of shares certificates
When a document is sent by post, service thereof should be deemed to be effective by properly addressing, prepaying and posting the letter containing the document. The presumption, which had been raised under section 53, was reputable and a shareholder might allege that he had not been delivered the share certificate or that it was not properly addressed.
Section 113 only requires company to keep certificates ready for delivery and does not impose an obligation on company to deliver them.
What is punishable under sub-section (2) of section 113 is non-delivery in accordance with the provision laid down under section 53 of the certificates of shares within prescribed time. So, if the documents are posted within stipulated time, there would be compliance of section 113 and there would not be any offence. [H.V. Jayaram v Industrial Credit & Investment Corpn. of India Ltd. (2000) 23 SCL 64 (SC)].
In the case of Herdilia Unimers Ltd. v Renu Jain (1998) 92 Comp Cas 841 (Raj), the registration receipt produced was bulk registered receipt from which it was not evident whether it was sent to registered address and/or on the basis of a document, which was not complete in itself.