I say 2100 is not a leap year? can anybody give the reason.
6 Replies
Ashok Agarwal
(46 Points)
Replied 04 June 2008
In case of century the leap year is found by dividing the year by 400 instead of 4 hence 2100 is not a leap year
CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani
(Landmark Group)
(23502 Points)
Replied 04 June 2008
Yes...gd but how do you abt it..??????
Priyanka Kala
(Student CA & CS)
(1397 Points)
Replied 04 June 2008
Plz explain in details...I am not clear with the concept here...
CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani
(Landmark Group)
(23502 Points)
Replied 05 June 2008
Its simple the year divisible by 4 is Leap year......!!!!!!!!
On the same logic Year 2100( 100 years from year 2000) is not a leap year.....
Next Leap year would be 2400 (Excatly divisible by 400)!!!!!!!!!
I hope now u have understood!!!!!!!
srinivasulu
(Accountant)
(63 Points)
Replied 06 June 2008
Hi prakash
U r correct but after 2100 next leap year is 2104 because 2104 year is divisible by 4 like 2108,2112,2116,2120,2124 etc so u can't wait for 2200 ok........
CA CS CIMA Prakash Somani
(Landmark Group)
(23502 Points)
Replied 06 June 2008
Yaa but i was talking about Leap Year in Centuries>>>>>
Recent Topics
- Json file error upld
- Conversion of format of corporate entity
- INPUT OF RCM Deposit through DRC03
- Refund of cash ledger amount
- Security services RCM Body Corporate
- GST and income tax for freelancers
- Association of Persons (AOP) agreement format requ
- I passed CA inter Group2 under the wrong gender
- Additional place of business to change as main pla
- Section 142[1] of IT Act notice
Related Threads
Trending Online Classes
-
Excel Mastery Program
CA Rishabh Pugalia
CAclubindia
